In a message dated 1/16/08 9:03:09 AM, cool@... writes:
> > I probably could make a case for taking it back and getting an 8-
> > core, but is it worth the hassle? What would you do? Let bygones
> > be bygones? Or ensure that you didn't purchase something that was
> > already EOL (end-of-life) already EOL (end-of-life)<wbr>, even if it
> > some bugs, instabilities, etc? I'd be interested in other opinions.
>
> Having been burned myself in the past - for the future - my simple rule is:
> only buy stuff when the "new thing comes out" - then either buy the new one
> or the old one at a discount.
>
We all get burned in this way. Apple could warn us of impending changes, but
then people would hold back from buying until the new one comes. So in order
to maximize profit, they have this code of silence. I try to follow RevDave's
advice too, but sometimes you gotta upgrade and can't wait any longer - and
then they introduce new models the next month.
I think the key deciding factor is how much of an upgrade is it. Sometimes
Apple makes a revolutionary upgrade, and sometimes its a minor one. They like to
announce something every so often, so sometimes the changes are quite minor.
That might be the case now. Although going to 8 cores is better, its unclear
how much real world increase in power this is because the software has to take
advantage of the changes. Its definitely not twice as fast a 4 cores.
**************
Start the year off right. Easy ways to stay in shape.
http://body.aol.com/fitness/winter-exercise?NCID=aolcmp00300000002489
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]