Marcos Maniacs group photo

Yahoo Groups archive

Marcos Maniacs

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 23:07 UTC

Thread

1600 GT rear suspension chassis - 5201

1600 GT rear suspension chassis - 5201

2013-07-14 by steinpom@...

After about 25 years of being apart I'm about to try and gather up all the parts and do a loose reassembly of the car to see if I still have all the pieces.  The car will then be taken apart again to finish the body restoration and get painted.  The immediate need is for some detailed photos and/or diagrams of the rear suspension and associated brackets etc etc for a wood hulled 1600 GT.  Any other manuals or instructions would be most appreciated.  The only build manual I can find on the internet is for the later tube frame chassis.  Were there significant changes to the suspension when the GT went from wood chassis to metal tube?

Thanks for the tips, advise and wisdom.

Danny

Re: [MarcosManiacs] 1600 GT rear suspension chassis - 5201

2013-07-14 by P Fischer

Hi Danny
No idea if this reaches you, but here we go. I owned a 67 wooden chassis and regret for ever selling it.
around 40 years after, I have now imported a steel chassis 3.9ltr around 80 model from GB. And it exhibits all the flaws I always knew about. Heavy as, with an engine that has not zip (albeit 3.9 ltr) and a feel like driving a tank. The wooden chasis GT1600 I owned was nimble as.
But as to details? I am now amazed at how little information is available about any of these cars. And I mean in detail: what is the rear axle, the front suspension, and so on. My earlier GT1600 had a Ford rear axle (a Ford 1660 engine and gear box and GT6, Herald or Spitfire front end stuff.
chers
Peter
Show quoted textHide quoted text
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Sunday, July 14, 2013 3:15 PM
Subject: [MarcosManiacs] 1600 GT rear suspension chassis - 5201

After about 25 years of being apart I'm about to try and gather up all the parts and do a loose reassembly of the car to see if I still have all the pieces. The car will then be taken apart again to finish the body restoration and get painted. The immediate need is for some detailed photos and/or diagrams of the rear suspension and associated brackets etc etc for a wood hulled 1600 GT. Any other manuals or instructions would be most appreciated. The only build manual I can find on the internet is for the later tube frame chassis. Were there significant changes to the suspension when the GT went from wood chassis to metal tube?

Thanks for the tips, advise and wisdom.

Danny

Re: [MarcosManiacs] 1600 GT rear suspension chassis - 5201

2013-07-14 by steve fzr

Hi Peter,

How is your car going?  Do you have it on the road?  I haven't touched mine since I put the new radiator in it about 8 months ago.  I didn't even start it again.  A couple of weeks dedicated work and I could probably have it back together, but that's not likely to happen for another year.  Then last Jan I bought an old BMW R100S to restore, and stalled while I waited for 5 months for a mate to get me some paint.  Some times when someone does you a favour they're not really doing you a favour at all.  I could have bought the paint and had the job finished three months ago.  I really wanted an R90S, but I was at Amaroo Park to see a R100S win the Castrol 6 hour back in 1977.  I'm compromising by painting my R100S in the R90S fogged Daytona orange.   Now I'm at NAB doing stupid long days again with no time for anything.  

How much does your Marocs weigh?  I'd have thought it'd be pretty light compared to the Volvo or Ford V6 versions. They'd be a different car altogether with a modern lightweight 2.0l Jap motor in, like the one in the S2000. 

Just saw a show on TV about the Honda S600.  Reminded me of my S800.  That was light and nimble, but underpowered, even when you revved it to 11,000 RPM as I did all the way to work and back each day.  

Regards,

Stephen Corneille
0417837436




________________________________
 From: P Fischer <fischerp@...>
To: MarcosManiacs@yahoogroups.com 
Sent: Sunday, July 14, 2013 3:42 PM
Subject: Re: [MarcosManiacs] 1600 GT rear suspension chassis - 5201
 


  
Hi Danny
 
No idea if this reaches you, but here we go. I 
owned a 67 wooden chassis and regret for ever selling it.
 
around 40 years after, I have now imported a steel 
chassis 3.9ltr around 80 model from GB. And it exhibits all the flaws I always 
knew about. Heavy as, with an engine that has not zip (albeit 3.9 ltr) and a 
feel like driving a tank.  The wooden chasis GT1600 I owned was nimble as. 
 
But as to details? I am now amazed at how little 
information is available about any of these cars. And I mean in detail: what is 
the rear axle, the front suspension, and so on. My earlier GT1600 had a Ford 
rear axle (a Ford 1660 engine and gear box and GT6, Herald or Spitfire front end 
stuff.
 
chers
 
Peter
 
----- Original Message ----- 
>From: steinpom@... 
>To: MarcosManiacs@yahoogroups.com 
>Sent: Sunday, July 14, 2013 3:15 PM
>Subject: [MarcosManiacs] 1600 GT rear  suspension chassis - 5201
>
>  
>After about 25 years of being apart I'm about to try and gather up all the  parts and do a loose reassembly of the car to see if I still have all the  pieces. The car will then be taken apart again to finish the body restoration  and get painted. The immediate need is for some detailed photos and/or  diagrams of the rear suspension and associated brackets etc etc for a wood  hulled 1600 GT. Any other manuals or instructions would be most appreciated.  The only build manual I can find on the internet is for the later tube frame  chassis. Were there significant changes to the suspension when the GT went  from wood chassis to metal tube?
>
>Thanks for the tips, advise and 
  wisdom.
Show quoted textHide quoted text
>
>Danny
>
>

RE: [MarcosManiacs] 1600 GT rear suspension chassis - 5201

2013-07-14 by Steinpom

Hello Peter,

 

Great to get such a quick response.  My problem is that I took the car apart
(it was complete when I got it) about 25 at least years ago.. like most
people I did not anticipate so many years to pass before getting back to the
project.  I foolishly did not take many photos as it was coming apart.  Then
a young friend of my kids decided to do me a favour and tidy up the various
piles of car parts I had in the basement and garage.  What he did not
realize was that parts were in various locations because they belonged to
various cars I have.  Hard to get mad at someone who's trying to do a favour
but..  Anyhow, time and the mixing up of parts has not made the restoration
any easier.  I'm told that there never was an official factory build manual
for this model, but I'm hoping someone has a lead on something.  I have a
number of TORQUE club magazines which have some info, but maybe one I don't
have would be more to the point.  Enough ranting for tonight.  Copies of any
pictures you might still have of the 1600 mechanicals or suspension would be
nice.

 

Danny
Show quoted textHide quoted text
From: MarcosManiacs@yahoogroups.com [mailto:MarcosManiacs@yahoogroups.com]
On Behalf Of P Fischer
Sent: Saturday, July 13, 2013 10:42 PM
To: MarcosManiacs@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [MarcosManiacs] 1600 GT rear suspension chassis - 5201

 

  

Hi Danny

 

No idea if this reaches you, but here we go. I owned a 67 wooden chassis and
regret for ever selling it.

 

around 40 years after, I have now imported a steel chassis 3.9ltr around 80
model from GB. And it exhibits all the flaws I always knew about. Heavy as,
with an engine that has not zip (albeit 3.9 ltr) and a feel like driving a
tank.  The wooden chasis GT1600 I owned was nimble as. 

 

But as to details? I am now amazed at how little information is available
about any of these cars. And I mean in detail: what is the rear axle, the
front suspension, and so on. My earlier GT1600 had a Ford rear axle (a Ford
1660 engine and gear box and GT6, Herald or Spitfire front end stuff.

 

chers

 

Peter

 

----- Original Message ----- 

From: steinpom@... 

To: MarcosManiacs@yahoogroups.com 

Sent: Sunday, July 14, 2013 3:15 PM

Subject: [MarcosManiacs] 1600 GT rear suspension chassis - 5201

 

  

After about 25 years of being apart I'm about to try and gather up all the
parts and do a loose reassembly of the car to see if I still have all the
pieces. The car will then be taken apart again to finish the body
restoration and get painted. The immediate need is for some detailed photos
and/or diagrams of the rear suspension and associated brackets etc etc for a
wood hulled 1600 GT. Any other manuals or instructions would be most
appreciated. The only build manual I can find on the internet is for the
later tube frame chassis. Were there significant changes to the suspension
when the GT went from wood chassis to metal tube?

Thanks for the tips, advise and wisdom.

Danny

Re: [MarcosManiacs] 1600 GT rear suspension chassis - 5201

2013-07-14 by P Fischer

Steve
What a surprise. I will answer in detail later, for now just let me say I am pleased to hear from you; and embarrassed about not contacting you sooner.
But, yes, my green car is on the road.
cheers
Peter
----- Original Message -----
Show quoted textHide quoted text
From: steve fzr
Sent: Sunday, July 14, 2013 4:00 PM
Subject: Re: [MarcosManiacs] 1600 GT rear suspension chassis - 5201

Hi Peter,

How is your car going? Do you have it on the road? I haven't touched mine since I put the new radiator in it about 8 months ago. I didn't even start it again. A couple of weeks dedicated work and I could probably have it back together, but that's not likely to happen for another year. Then last Jan I bought an old BMW R100S to restore, and stalled while I waited for 5 months for a mate to get me some paint. Some times when someone does you a favour they're not really doing you a favour at all. I could have bought the paint and had the job finished three months ago. I really wanted an R90S, but I was at Amaroo Park to see a R100S win the Castrol 6 hour back in 1977. I'm compromising by painting my R100S in the R90S fogged Daytona orange. Now I'm at NAB doing stupid long days again with no time for anything.

How much does your Marocs weigh? I'd have thought it'd be pretty light compared to the Volvo or Ford V6 versions. They'd be a different car altogether with a modern lightweight 2.0l Jap motor in, like the one in the S2000.

Just saw a show on TV about the Honda S600. Reminded me of my S800. That was light and nimble, but underpowered, even when you revved it to 11,000 RPM as I did all the way to work and back each day.

Regards,

Stephen Corneille
0417837436


From: P Fischer
To: MarcosManiacs@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Sunday, July 14, 2013 3:42 PM
Subject: Re: [MarcosManiacs] 1600 GT rear suspension chassis - 5201

Hi Danny
;
No idea if this reaches you, but here we go. I owned a 67 wooden chassis and regret for ever selling it.
around 40 years after, I have now imported a steel chassis 3.9ltr around 80 model from GB. And it exhibits all the flaws I always knew about. Heavy as, with an engine that has not zip (albeit 3.9 ltr) and a feel like driving a tank. The wooden chasis GT1600 I owned was nimble as.
But as to details? I am now amazed at how little information is available about any of these cars. And I mean in detail: what is the rear axle, the front suspension, and so on. My earlier GT1600 had a Ford rear axle (a Ford 1660 engine and gear box and GT6, Herald or Spitfire front end stuff.
chers
Peter
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Sunday, July 14, 2013 3:15 PM
Subject: [MarcosManiacs] 1600 GT rear suspension chassis - 5201

After about 25 years of being apart I'm about to try and gather up all the parts and do a loose reassembly of the car to see if I still have all the pieces. The car will then be taken apart again to finish the body restoration and get painted. The immediate need is for some detailed photos and/or diagrams of the rear suspension and associated brackets etc etc for a wood hulled 1600 GT. Any other manuals or instructions would be most appreciated. The only build manual I can find on the internet is for the later tube frame chassis. Were there significant changes to the suspension when the GT went from wood chassis to metal tube?

Thanks for the tips, advise and wisdom.

Danny



Re: [MarcosManiacs] 1600 GT rear suspension chassis - 5201

2013-07-14 by Richard Brengman

I have not taken mine very far apart yet.
Rear suspension is still all original and intact.
Pics will be awkward but possible since it's in an attic.
Actually pretty simple, odd arrangement to the locating arms but it works fine until the mounts begin to auger out.
You will want to reinforce the attachments.

Loads of info on the wood chassis cars at the U.K. Marcos site, http://marcossportscarenthusiasts.yuku.com/
They are particularly fond of the wood cars.
There is a full restoration thread there with loads of excellent pictures.




On Jul 13, 2013, at 11:08 PM, Steinpom wrote:


Hello Peter,

Great to get such a quick response. My problem is that I took the car apart (it was complete when I got it) about 25 at least years ago.. like most people I did not anticipate so many years to pass before getting back to the project. I foolishly did not take many photos as it was coming apart. Then a young friend of my kids decided to do me a favour and tidy up the various piles of car parts I had in the basement and garage. What he did not realize was that parts were in various locations because they belonged to various cars I have. Hard to get mad at someone who’s trying to do a favour but…. Anyhow, time and the mixing up of parts has not ma! de the restoration any easier. I’m told that there never was an official factory build manual for this model, but I’m hoping someone has a lead on something. I have a number of TORQUE club magazines which have some info, but maybe one I don’t have would be more to the point. Enough ranting for tonight. Copies of any pictures you might still have of the 1600 mechanicals or suspension would be nice.

Danny

From: MarcosManiacs@yahoogroups.com [mailto:MarcosManiacs@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of P FischerSent: Saturday, July 13, 2013 10:42 PM
To: MarcosManiacs@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [MarcosManiacs] 1600 GT rear suspension chassis - 5201

Hi Danny

No idea if this reaches you, but here we go. I owned a 67 wooden chassis and regret for ever selling it.

around 40 years after, I have now imported a steel chassis 3.9ltr around 80 model from GB. And it exhibits all the flaws I always knew about. Heavy as, with an engine that has not zip (albeit 3.9 ltr) and a feel like driving a tank. The wooden chasis GT1600 I owned was nimble as.

But as to details? I am now amazed at how little information is available about any of these cars. And I mean in detail: what is the rear axle, the front suspension, and so on. My earlier GT1600 had a Ford rear axle (a Ford 1660 engine and gear box and GT6, Herald or Spitfire front end stuff.

chers

Peter

----- Original Message -----

Sent: Sunday, July 14, 2013 3:15 PM

Subject: [MarcosManiacs] 1600 GT rear suspension chassis - 5201

;

After about 25 years of being apart I'm about to try and gather up all the parts and do a loose reassembly of the car to see if I still have all the pieces. The ca! r will then be taken apart again to finish the body restoration and get painted. The immediate need is for some detailed photos and/or diagrams of the rear suspension and associated brackets etc etc for a wood hulled 1600 GT. Any other manuals or instructions would be most appreciated. The only build manual I can find on the internet is for the later tube frame chassis. Were there significant changes to the suspension when the GT went from wood chassis to metal tube?

Thanks for the tips, advise and wisdom.

Danny



RE: [MarcosManiacs] 1600 GT rear suspension chassis - 5201

2013-07-17 by Steinpom

Hello Richard,

 

I would really appreciate some photos, especially of the panhard rod
connections and the area around the rear shock   mounts.  I still have the
old mounts which were slightly twisted when I took them off as they seem to
have been made from a fairly light guage sheet metal with no gussets or
other stiffeners.  I had much heavier ones made up which I also still have.
Speaking only from memory, I seem to recall that there was another bracket
that was also mounted with one of the shock mount bolts and then an
additional bolt.  Does your car have this, or is my mind playing tricks.  If
its there what is it for?  I was such an idiot for not taking photos - but I
did anticipate the car being put back together right away at that time.
Having now restored 2 other cars I now know these projects can be measured
in decades unless tackled almost full-time.

 

Anyhow much gratitude for any help.  Pictures of my car in pieces can be
seen on marcosmaniacs.

 

Danny 
Show quoted textHide quoted text
From: MarcosManiacs@yahoogroups.com [mailto:MarcosManiacs@yahoogroups.com]
On Behalf Of Richard Brengman
Sent: Sunday, July 14, 2013 12:08 AM
To: MarcosManiacs@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [MarcosManiacs] 1600 GT rear suspension chassis - 5201

 

  

I have not taken mine very far apart yet.

Rear suspension is still all original and intact.

Pics will be awkward but possible since it's in an attic.

Actually pretty simple, odd arrangement to the locating arms but it works
fine until the mounts begin to auger out.

You will want to reinforce the attachments.

 

Loads of info on the wood chassis cars at the U.K. Marcos site,
http://marcossportscarenthusiasts.yuku.com/ 

They are particularly fond of the wood cars.

There is a full restoration thread there with loads of excellent pictures.

 





 

On Jul 13, 2013, at 11:08 PM, Steinpom wrote:





  

 

Hello Peter,

 

Great to get such a quick response.  My problem is that I took the car apart
(it was complete when I got it) about 25 at least years ago.. like most
people I did not anticipate so many years to pass before getting back to the
project.  I foolishly did not take many photos as it was coming apart.  Then
a young friend of my kids decided to do me a favour and tidy up the various
piles of car parts I had in the basement and garage.  What he did not
realize was that parts were in various locations because they belonged to
various cars I have.  Hard to get mad at someone who's trying to do a favour
but..  Anyhow, time and the mixing up of parts has not ma! de the
restoration any easier.  I'm told that there never was an official factory
build manual for this model, but I'm hoping someone has a lead on something.
I have a number of TORQUE club magazines which have some info, but maybe one
I don't have would be more to the point.  Enough ranting for tonight.
Copies of any pictures you might still have of the 1600 mechanicals or
suspension would be nice.

 

Danny

 

From: MarcosManiacs@yahoogroups.com [mailto:MarcosManiacs@yahoogroups.com]
On Behalf Of P Fischer
Sent: Saturday, July 13, 2013 10:42 PM
To: MarcosManiacs@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [MarcosManiacs] 1600 GT rear suspension chassis - 5201

 

  

Hi Danny

 

No idea if this reaches you, but here we go. I owned a 67 wooden chassis and
regret for ever selling it.

 

around 40 years after, I have now imported a steel chassis 3.9ltr around 80
model from GB. And it exhibits all the flaws I always knew about. Heavy as,
with an engine that has not zip (albeit 3.9 ltr) and a feel like driving a
tank.  The wooden chasis GT1600 I owned was nimble as. 

 

But as to details? I am now amazed at how little information is available
about any of these cars. And I mean in detail: what is the rear axle, the
front suspension, and so on. My earlier GT1600 had a Ford rear axle (a Ford
1660 engine and gear box and GT6, Herald or Spitfire front end stuff.

 

chers

 

Peter

 

----- Original Message ----- 

From: steinpom@... 

To: MarcosManiacs@yahoogroups.com 

Sent: Sunday, July 14, 2013 3:15 PM

Subject: [MarcosManiacs] 1600 GT rear suspension chassis - 5201

 

  

After about 25 years of being apart I'm about to try and gather up all the
parts and do a loose reassembly of the car to see if I still have all the
pieces. The ca! r will then be taken apart again to finish the body
restoration and get painted. The immediate need is for some detailed photos
and/or diagrams of the rear suspension and associated brackets etc etc for a
wood hulled 1600 GT. Any other manuals or instructions would be most
appreciated. The only build manual I can find on the internet is for the
later tube frame chassis. Were there significant changes to the suspension
when the GT went from wood chassis to metal tube?

Thanks for the tips, advise and wisdom.

Danny

 

  _____  


Spam
<https://antispam.roaringpenguin.com/canit/b.php?i=02K068b1j&m=625e408cd6a3&
t=20130714&c=s> 
Not spam
<https://antispam.roaringpenguin.com/canit/b.php?i=02K068b1j&m=625e408cd6a3&
t=20130714&c=n> 
Forget previous vote
<https://antispam.roaringpenguin.com/canit/b.php?i=02K068b1j&m=625e408cd6a3&
t=20130714&c=f>

Re: [MarcosManiacs] 1600 GT rear suspension chassis - 5201

2013-07-17 by P Fischer

hi again
Not sure if attached images work; if so, to my knowledge the image shows the ford axle that I had in my 1600GT. modified, of course, for the radius rods
----- Original Message -----
Show quoted textHide quoted text
From: Steinpom
Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2013 4:04 PM
Subject: RE: [MarcosManiacs] 1600 GT rear suspension chassis - 5201

Hello Richard,

I would really appreciate some photos, especially of the panhard rod connections and the area around the rear shock mounts. I still have the old mounts which were slightly twisted when I took them off as they seem to have been made from a fairly light guage sheet metal with no gussets or other stiffeners. I had much heavier ones made up which I also still have. Speaking only from memory, I seem to recall that there was another bracket that was also mounted with one of the shock mount bolts and then an additional bolt. Does your car have this, or is my mind playing tricks. If its there what is it for? I was such an idiot for not taking photos – but I did anticipate the car being put back together right away at that time. Having now restored 2 other cars I now know these projects can be measured in decades unless tackled almost full-time.

Anyhow much gratitude for any help. Pictures of my car in pieces can be seen on marcosmaniacs.

Danny

From: MarcosManiacs@yahoogroups.com [mailto:MarcosManiacs@yahoo groups.com] On Behalf Of Richard Brengman
Sent: Sunday, July 14, 2013 12:08 AM
To: MarcosManiacs@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [MarcosManiacs] 1600 GT rear suspension chassis - 5201

I have not taken mine very far apart yet.

Rear suspension is still all original and intact.

Pics will be awkward but possible since it's in an attic.

Actually pretty simple, odd arrangement to the locating arms but it works fine until the mount s begin to auger out.

You will want to reinforce the attachments.

Loads of info on the wood chassis cars at the U.K. Marcos site, http://marcossportscarenthusiasts.yuku.com/

They are particularly fond of the wood cars.

There is a full restoration thread there with loads of excellent pictures.



On Jul 13, 2013, at 11:08 PM, Steinpom wrote:



Hello Peter,

Great to get such a quick response. My problem is that I took the car apart (it was complete when I got it) about 25 at least years ago.. like most people I did not anticipate so many years to pass before getting back to the project. I foolishly did not take many photos as it was coming apart. Then a young friend of my kids decided to do me a favour and tidy up the variou s piles of car parts I had in the basement and garage. What he did not realize was that parts were in various locations because they belonged to various cars I have. Hard to get mad at someone who’s trying to do a favour but…. Anyhow, time and the mixing up of parts has not ma! de the restoration any easier. I’m told that there never was an official factory build manual for this model, but I’m hoping someone has a lead on something. I have a number of TORQUE club magazines which have some info, but maybe one I don’t have would be more to the point. Enough ranting for tonight. Copies of any pictures you might still have of the 1600 mechanicals or suspension would be nice.

Danny

From: MarcosManiacs@yahoogroups.com [mailto:MarcosManiacs@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of P Fischer
Sent: Saturday, July 13, 2013 10:42 PM
To: MarcosManiacs@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [MarcosManiacs] 1600 GT rear suspension chassis - 5201

Hi Danny

No idea if this reaches you, but here we go. I owned a 67 wooden chassis and regret for ever selling it.

around 40 years after, I have now imported a steel chassis 3.9ltr around 80 model from GB. And it exhibits all the flaws I always knew about. Heavy as, with an engine that has not zip (albeit 3.9 ltr) and a feel like driving a tank. The wooden chasis GT1600 I owned was nimble as.

But as to details? I am now amazed at how little information is available about any of these cars. And I mean in detail: what is the rear axle, the front suspension, and so on. My earlier GT1600 had a Ford rear axle (a Ford 1660 engine and gear box and GT6, Herald or Spitfire front end stuff.

chers

Peter

----- Original Message -----

From: steinpom@...

Sent:< /span> Sunday, July 14, 2013 3:15 PM

Subject: [MarcosManiacs] 1600 GT rear suspension chassis - 5201

After about 25 years of being apart I'm about to try and gather up all the parts and do a loose reassembly of the car to see if I still have all the pieces. The ca! r will then be taken apart again to finish the body restoration and get painted. The immediate need is for some detailed photos and/or diagrams of the rear suspension and associated brackets etc etc for a wood hulled 1600 GT. Any other manuals or instructions would be most appreciated. The only build manual I can find on the internet is for the later tube frame chassis. Were there significant changes to the suspension when the GT went from wood chassis to metal tube?

Thanks for the tips, advise and wisdom.

Danny

Attachments

Re: [MarcosManiacs] 1600 GT rear suspension chassis - 5201

2013-07-17 by P Fischer

and one more
----- Original Message -----
Show quoted textHide quoted text
From: Steinpom
Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2013 4:04 PM
Subject: RE: [MarcosManiacs] 1600 GT rear suspension chassis - 5201

Hello Richard,

I would really appreciate some photos, especially of the panhard rod connections and the area around the rear shock mounts. I still have the old mounts which were slightly twisted when I took them off as they seem to have been made from a fairly light guage sheet metal with no gussets or other stiffeners. I had much heavier ones made up which I also still have. Speaking only from memory, I seem to recall that there was another bracket that was also mounted with one of the shock mount bolts and then an additional bolt. Does your car have this, or is my mind playing tricks. If its there what is it for? I was such an idiot for not taking photos – but I did anticipate the car being put back together right away at that time. Having now restored 2 other cars I now know these projects can be measured in decades unless tackled almost full-time.

Anyhow much gratitude for any help. Pictures of my car in pieces can be seen on marcosmaniacs.

Danny

From: MarcosManiacs@yahoogroups.com [mailto:MarcosManiacs@yahoo groups.com] On Behalf Of Richard Brengman
Sent: Sunday, July 14, 2013 12:08 AM
To: MarcosManiacs@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [MarcosManiacs] 1600 GT rear suspension chassis - 5201

I have not taken mine very far apart yet.

Rear suspension is still all original and intact.

Pics will be awkward but possible since it's in an attic.

Actually pretty simple, odd arrangement to the locating arms but it works fine until the mount s begin to auger out.

You will want to reinforce the attachments.

Loads of info on the wood chassis cars at the U.K. Marcos site, http://marcossportscarenthusiasts.yuku.com/

They are particularly fond of the wood cars.

There is a full restoration thread there with loads of excellent pictures.



On Jul 13, 2013, at 11:08 PM, Steinpom wrote:



Hello Peter,

Great to get such a quick response. My problem is that I took the car apart (it was complete when I got it) about 25 at least years ago.. like most people I did not anticipate so many years to pass before getting back to the project. I foolishly did not take many photos as it was coming apart. Then a young friend of my kids decided to do me a favour and tidy up the variou s piles of car parts I had in the basement and garage. What he did not realize was that parts were in various locations because they belonged to various cars I have. Hard to get mad at someone who’s trying to do a favour but…. Anyhow, time and the mixing up of parts has not ma! de the restoration any easier. I’m told that there never was an official factory build manual for this model, but I’m hoping someone has a lead on something. I have a number of TORQUE club magazines which have some info, but maybe one I don’t have would be more to the point. Enough ranting for tonight. Copies of any pictures you might still have of the 1600 mechanicals or suspension would be nice.

Danny

From: MarcosManiacs@yahoogroups.com [mailto:MarcosManiacs@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of P Fischer
Sent: Saturday, July 13, 2013 10:42 PM
To: MarcosManiacs@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [MarcosManiacs] 1600 GT rear suspension chassis - 5201

Hi Danny

No idea if this reaches you, but here we go. I owned a 67 wooden chassis and regret for ever selling it.

around 40 years after, I have now imported a steel chassis 3.9ltr around 80 model from GB. And it exhibits all the flaws I always knew about. Heavy as, with an engine that has not zip (albeit 3.9 ltr) and a feel like driving a tank. The wooden chasis GT1600 I owned was nimble as.

But as to details? I am now amazed at how little information is available about any of these cars. And I mean in detail: what is the rear axle, the front suspension, and so on. My earlier GT1600 had a Ford rear axle (a Ford 1660 engine and gear box and GT6, Herald or Spitfire front end stuff.

chers

Peter

----- Original Message -----

From: steinpom@...

Sent:< /span> Sunday, July 14, 2013 3:15 PM

Subject: [MarcosManiacs] 1600 GT rear suspension chassis - 5201

;

After about 25 years of being apart I'm about to try and gather up all the parts and do a loose reassembly of the car to see if I still have all the pieces. The ca! r will then be taken apart again to finish the body restoration and get painted. The immediate need is for some detailed photos and/or diagrams of the rear suspension and associated brackets etc etc for a wood hulled 1600 GT. Any other manuals or instructions would be most appreciated. The only build manual I can find on the internet is for the later tube frame chassis. Were there significant changes to the suspension when the GT went from wood chassis to metal tube?

Thanks for the tips, advise and wisdom.

Danny

Attachments

RE: [MarcosManiacs] 1600 GT rear suspension chassis - 5201 [1 Attachment]

2013-07-17 by Steinpom

Thanks Peter.  I was able to open and save the one photo of the rear
suspension diagram.  Does anyone have a photo of the shock mount bracket and
the bracket for the end of the panhard rod?

 

Danny
Show quoted textHide quoted text
From: MarcosManiacs@yahoogroups.com [mailto:MarcosManiacs@yahoogroups.com]
On Behalf Of P Fischer
Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2013 11:34 PM
To: MarcosManiacs@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [MarcosManiacs] 1600 GT rear suspension chassis - 5201 [1
Attachment]

 

  

[Attachment(s) from P Fischer included below] 

hi again

 

Not sure if attached images work; if so, to my knowledge the image shows the
ford axle that I had in my 1600GT. modified, of course, for the radius rods

----- Original Message ----- 

From: Steinpom <mailto:steinpom@...>  

To: MarcosManiacs@yahoogroups.com 

Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2013 4:04 PM

Subject: RE: [MarcosManiacs] 1600 GT rear suspension chassis - 5201

 

  

Hello Richard,

I would really appreciate some photos, especially of the panhard rod
connections and the area around the rear shock   mounts.  I still have the
old mounts which were slightly twisted when I took them off as they seem to
have been made from a fairly light guage sheet metal with no gussets or
other stiffeners.  I had much heavier ones made up which I also still have.
Speaking only from memory, I seem to recall that there was another bracket
that was also mounted with one of the shock mount bolts and then an
additional bolt.  Does your car have this, or is my mind playing tricks.  If
its there what is it for?  I was such an idiot for not taking photos - but I
did anticipate the car being put back together right away at that time.
Having now restored 2 other cars I now know these projects can be measured
in decades unless tackled almost full-time.

Anyhow much gratitude for any help.  Pictures of my car in pieces can be
seen on marcosmaniacs.

Danny 

From: MarcosManiacs@yahoogroups.com [mailto:MarcosManiacs@yahoo groups.com
<mailto:MarcosManiacs@yahoo%20groups.com> ] On Behalf Of Richard Brengman
Sent: Sunday, July 14, 2013 12:08 AM
To: MarcosManiacs@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [MarcosManiacs] 1600 GT rear suspension chassis - 5201

  

I have not taken mine very far apart yet.

Rear suspension is still all original and intact.

Pics will be awkward but possible since it's in an attic.

Actually pretty simple, odd arrangement to the locating arms but it works
fine until the mount s begin to auger out.

You will want to reinforce the attachments.

Loads of info on the wood chassis cars at the U.K. Marcos site,
http://marcossportscarenthusiasts.yuku.com/ 

They are particularly fond of the wood cars.

There is a full restoration thread there with loads of excellent pictures.






On Jul 13, 2013, at 11:08 PM, Steinpom wrote:






  

Hello Peter,

Great to get such a quick response.  My problem is that I took the car apart
(it was complete when I got it) about 25 at least years ago.. like most
people I did not anticipate so many years to pass before getting back to the
project.  I foolishly did not take many photos as it was coming apart.  Then
a young friend of my kids decided to do me a favour and tidy up the variou s
piles of car parts I had in the basement and garage.  What he did not
realize was that parts were in various locations because they belonged to
various cars I have.  Hard to get mad at someone who's trying to do a favour
but..  Anyhow, time and the mixing up of parts has not ma! de the
restoration any easier.  I'm told that there never was an official factory
build manual for this model, but I'm hoping someone has a lead on something.
I have a number of TORQUE club magazines which have some info, but maybe one
I don't have would be more to the point.  Enough ranting for tonight.
Copies of any pictures you might still have of the 1600 mechanicals or
suspension would be nice.

Danny

From: MarcosManiacs@yahoogroups.com [mailto:MarcosManiacs@yahoogroups.com]
On Behalf Of P Fischer
Sent: Saturday, July 13, 2013 10:42 PM
To: MarcosManiacs@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [MarcosManiacs] 1600 GT rear suspension chassis - 5201

  

Hi Danny

No idea if this reaches you, but here we go. I owned a 67 wooden chassis and
regret for ever selling it.

around 40 years after, I have now imported a steel chassis 3.9ltr around 80
model from GB. And it exhibits all the flaws I always knew about. Heavy as,
with an engine that has not zip (albeit 3.9 ltr) and a feel like driving a
tank.  The wooden chasis GT1600 I owned was nimble as. 

But as to details? I am now amazed at how little information is available
about any of these cars. And I mean in detail: what is the rear axle, the
front suspension, and so on. My earlier GT1600 had a Ford rear axle (a Ford
1660 engine and gear box and GT6, Herald or Spitfire front end stuff.

chers

Peter

----- Original Message ----- 

From: steinpom@... 

To: MarcosManiacs@yahoogroups.com 

Sent:< /span> Sunday, July 14, 2013 3:15 PM

Subject: [MarcosManiacs] 1600 GT rear suspension chassis - 5201

  

After about 25 years of being apart I'm about to try and gather up all the
parts and do a loose reassembly of the car to see if I still have all the
pieces. The ca! r will then be taken apart again to finish the body
restoration and get painted. The immediate need is for some detailed photos
and/or diagrams of the rear suspension and associated brackets etc etc for a
wood hulled 1600 GT. Any other manuals or instructions would be most
appreciated. The only build manual I can find on the internet is for the
later tube frame chassis. Were there significant changes to the suspension
when the GT went from wood chassis to metal tube?

Thanks for the tips, advise and wisdom.

Danny


  _____  



Spam
<https://antispam.roaringpenguin.com/canit/b.php?i=02K068b1j&m=625e408cd6a3&
t=20130714&c=s> 
Not spam
<https://antispam.roaringpenguin.com/canit/b.php?i=02K068b1j&m=625e408cd6a3&
t=20130714&c=n> 
Forget previous vote
<https://antispam.roaringpenguin.com/canit/b.php?i=02K068b1j&m=625e408cd6a3&
t=20130714&c=f>

RE: [MarcosManiacs] 1600 GT rear suspension chassis - 5201 [1 Attachment]

2013-07-17 by Steinpom

Peter, thanks once again.  The front suspension is less of a mystery than
the rear, but everything helps.

 

Danny
Show quoted textHide quoted text
From: MarcosManiacs@yahoogroups.com [mailto:MarcosManiacs@yahoogroups.com]
On Behalf Of P Fischer
Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2013 11:35 PM
To: MarcosManiacs@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [MarcosManiacs] 1600 GT rear suspension chassis - 5201 [1
Attachment]

 

  

[Attachment(s) from P Fischer included below] 

and one more

 

 

----- Original Message ----- 

From: Steinpom <mailto:steinpom@...>  

To: MarcosManiacs@yahoogroups.com 

Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2013 4:04 PM

Subject: RE: [MarcosManiacs] 1600 GT rear suspension chassis - 5201

 

  

Hello Richard,

I would really appreciate some photos, especially of the panhard rod
connections and the area around the rear shock   mounts.  I still have the
old mounts which were slightly twisted when I took them off as they seem to
have been made from a fairly light guage sheet metal with no gussets or
other stiffeners.  I had much heavier ones made up which I also still have.
Speaking only from memory, I seem to recall that there was another bracket
that was also mounted with one of the shock mount bolts and then an
additional bolt.  Does your car have this, or is my mind playing tricks.  If
its there what is it for?  I was such an idiot for not taking photos - but I
did anticipate the car being put back together right away at that time.
Having now restored 2 other cars I now know these projects can be measured
in decades unless tackled almost full-time.

Anyhow much gratitude for any help.  Pictures of my car in pieces can be
seen on marcosmaniacs.

Danny 

From: MarcosManiacs@yahoogroups.com [mailto:MarcosManiacs@yahoo groups.com
<mailto:MarcosManiacs@yahoo%20groups.com> ] On Behalf Of Richard Brengman
Sent: Sunday, July 14, 2013 12:08 AM
To: MarcosManiacs@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [MarcosManiacs] 1600 GT rear suspension chassis - 5201

  

I have not taken mine very far apart yet.

Rear suspension is still all original and intact.

Pics will be awkward but possible since it's in an attic.

Actually pretty simple, odd arrangement to the locating arms but it works
fine until the mount s begin to auger out.

You will want to reinforce the attachments.

Loads of info on the wood chassis cars at the U.K. Marcos site,
http://marcossportscarenthusiasts.yuku.com/ 

They are particularly fond of the wood cars.

There is a full restoration thread there with loads of excellent pictures.






On Jul 13, 2013, at 11:08 PM, Steinpom wrote:






  

Hello Peter,

Great to get such a quick response.  My problem is that I took the car apart
(it was complete when I got it) about 25 at least years ago.. like most
people I did not anticipate so many years to pass before getting back to the
project.  I foolishly did not take many photos as it was coming apart.  Then
a young friend of my kids decided to do me a favour and tidy up the variou s
piles of car parts I had in the basement and garage.  What he did not
realize was that parts were in various locations because they belonged to
various cars I have.  Hard to get mad at someone who's trying to do a favour
but..  Anyhow, time and the mixing up of parts has not ma! de the
restoration any easier.  I'm told that there never was an official factory
build manual for this model, but I'm hoping someone has a lead on something.
I have a number of TORQUE club magazines which have some info, but maybe one
I don't have would be more to the point.  Enough ranting for tonight.
Copies of any pictures you might still have of the 1600 mechanicals or
suspension would be nice.

Danny

From: MarcosManiacs@yahoogroups.com [mailto:MarcosManiacs@yahoogroups.com]
On Behalf Of P Fischer
Sent: Saturday, July 13, 2013 10:42 PM
To: MarcosManiacs@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [MarcosManiacs] 1600 GT rear suspension chassis - 5201

  

Hi Danny

No idea if this reaches you, but here we go. I owned a 67 wooden chassis and
regret for ever selling it.

around 40 years after, I have now imported a steel chassis 3.9ltr around 80
model from GB. And it exhibits all the flaws I always knew about. Heavy as,
with an engine that has not zip (albeit 3.9 ltr) and a feel like driving a
tank.  The wooden chasis GT1600 I owned was nimble as. 

But as to details? I am now amazed at how little information is available
about any of these cars. And I mean in detail: what is the rear axle, the
front suspension, and so on. My earlier GT1600 had a Ford rear axle (a Ford
1660 engine and gear box and GT6, Herald or Spitfire front end stuff.

chers

Peter

----- Original Message ----- 

From: steinpom@... 

To: MarcosManiacs@yahoogroups.com 

Sent:< /span> Sunday, July 14, 2013 3:15 PM

Subject: [MarcosManiacs] 1600 GT rear suspension chassis - 5201

  

After about 25 years of being apart I'm about to try and gather up all the
parts and do a loose reassembly of the car to see if I still have all the
pieces. The ca! r will then be taken apart again to finish the body
restoration and get painted. The immediate need is for some detailed photos
and/or diagrams of the rear suspension and associated brackets etc etc for a
wood hulled 1600 GT. Any other manuals or instructions would be most
appreciated. The only build manual I can find on the internet is for the
later tube frame chassis. Were there significant changes to the suspension
when the GT went from wood chassis to metal tube?

Thanks for the tips, advise and wisdom.

Danny


  _____  



Spam
<https://antispam.roaringpenguin.com/canit/b.php?i=02K068b1j&m=625e408cd6a3&
t=20130714&c=s> 
Not spam
<https://antispam.roaringpenguin.com/canit/b.php?i=02K068b1j&m=625e408cd6a3&
t=20130714&c=n> 
Forget previous vote
<https://antispam.roaringpenguin.com/canit/b.php?i=02K068b1j&m=625e408cd6a3&
t=20130714&c=f>

Re: [MarcosManiacs] 1600 GT rear suspension chassis - 5201

2013-07-17 by Richard Brengman

I will try in the morning.

Richard Brengman
1422-A Industrial Way
Gardnerville, NV 89410

www.specialinterestarms.com



On Jul 16, 2013, at 11:04 PM, Steinpom wrote:


Hello Richard,

I would really appreciate some photos, especially of the panhard rod connections and the area around the rear shock mounts. I still have the old mounts which were slightly twisted when I took them off as they seem to have been made from a fairly light guage sheet metal with no gussets or other stiffeners. I had much heavier ones made up which I also still have. Speaking only from memory, I seem to recall that there was another bracket that was also mounted with one of the shock mount bolts and then an additional bolt. Does your car have this, or is my mind playing tricks. If its there what is it for? I was such an idiot for not taking photos! – but I did anticipate the car being put back together right away at that time. Having now restored 2 other cars I now know these projects can be measured in decades unless tackled almost full-time.

Anyhow much gratitude for any help. Pictures of my car in pieces can be seen on marcosmaniacs.

Danny

Show quoted textHide quoted text

From: MarcosManiacs@yahoogroups.com [mailto:MarcosManiacs@yah! oogroups.com] On Behalf Of Richard Brengman
Sent: Sunday, July 14, 2013 12:08 AM
To: MarcosManiacs@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [MarcosManiacs] 1600 GT rear suspension chassis - 5201

I have not taken mine very far apart yet.

Rear suspension is still all original and intact.

Pics will be awkward but possible since it's in an attic.

Actually pretty simple, odd arrangement to the locating arms but it works fine until the mounts begin to auger out.

You will want to reinforce the attachments.

Loads of info on the wood chassis cars at the U.K. Marcos site, http://marcossportscarenthusiasts.yuku.com/

They are particularly fond of the wood cars.

There is a full restoration thread there with loads of excellent pictures.



On Jul 13, 2013, at 11:08 PM, Steinpom wrote:



Hello Peter,

Great to get such a quick response. My problem is that I took the car apart (it was complete when I got it) about 25 at least years ago.. like most people I did not anticipate so many years to pass before getting back to the project. I foolishly did not take many photos as it was coming apart. Then a young friend of my kids decided to do me a favour and tidy up the various piles of car parts I had in the basement and garage. What he did not realize was that parts were in various locations because the! y belonged to various cars I have. Hard to get mad at someone who’s trying to do a favour but…. Anyhow, time and the mixing up of parts has not ma! de the restoration any easier. I’m told that there never was an official factory build manual for this model, but I’m hoping someone has a lead on something. I have a number of TORQUE club magazines which have some info, but maybe one I don’t have would be more to the point. ; Enough ranting for tonight.. Copies of any pictures you might still have of the 1600 mechanicals or suspension would be nice.

Danny

From: MarcosManiacs@yahoogroups.com [mailto:MarcosManiacs@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of P Fischer
Sent: Saturday, July 13, 2013 10:42 PM
To: MarcosManiacs@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [MarcosManiacs] 1600 GT rear suspension chassis - 5201

Hi Danny

No idea if this reaches you, but here we go. I owned a 67 wooden chassis and regret for ever selling it.

around 40 years after, I have now imported a steel chassis 3.9ltr around 80 model from GB. And it exhibits all the flaws I always knew about. Heavy as, with an engine that has not zip (albeit 3.9 ltr) and a feel like driving a tank. The wooden chasis GT1600 I owned was nimble as.

But as to details? I am now amazed at how little information is available about any of these cars. And I mean in detail: what is the rear axle, the front suspension, and so on. My earlier GT1600 had a Ford rear axle (a Ford 1660 engine and gear box and GT6, Herald or Spitfire front end stuff.

chers

Peter

----- Original Message -----

Sent: Sunday, July 14, 2013 3:15 PM

Subject: [MarcosManiacs] 1600 GT rear suspension chassis - 5201

After about 25 years of being apart I'm about to try and gather up all the parts and do a loose reassembly of the car to see if I still have all the pieces. The ca! r will then be taken apart again to finish the body restoration and get painted. The immediate need is for some detailed photos and/or diagrams of the rear suspension and associated brackets etc etc for a wood hulled 1600 GT. Any other manuals or instructions would be most appreciated. The only build manual I can find on the internet is for the later tube frame chassis. Were there significant changes to the suspension when the GT went from wood chassis to metal tube?

Thanks for the tips, advise and wisdom.

Danny






Re: [MarcosManiacs] 1600 GT rear suspension chassis - 5201

2013-07-17 by andy derrick

Hi Danny

I don't have any pics as I'm in Aus and my car (1500gt 1966) is in the UK but hopefully this can be helpful as I rebuilt all suspension some years ago.

As a starter and I'm sure you know. Post 65 front suspension is triumph GT6. Wishbones also off of spitfire / herald and vitesse. Uprights are purely GT6/vitesse as calliper mounts are different than spitfire. Steering rack is GT6/Vitesse with a one inch space inserted to restrict full lock hitting the headlamp bowls. Critical if you have an original short bonnet.

Rear suspension consists of two identical vertical shock upper mounts which have from memory 4 bolt fixings into chassis with captives in the chassis to connect them to. I think the lowest bolt also holds the steel bar which goes across the car between both mounts.

Lower shock mounts bolt to modified ford cortina axle

Panhard rod has rose bush that slides onto axle stud on one side. Other side bolts to a horizontal steel mount which bolts with captive nuts into the lower boot area . This also has a bolt inside the axle tunnel to stop movement

The trailing arms have split half bushes to mount on the axle ( one arm is adjustable) and then small rubber donout bushes on top arm bolting through vertical wooden chassis panel at rear of car and larger do outs on the bottom arm. The holes in the wood often elongate and cause handling issues and are often badly repaired.

Not sure if this is any help. It's pretty easy and if you need bushes , Rory at marcos heritage in the UK has them. He also can supply mounts and trailing arms. I made my mounts out of stainless but stuck with steel arms and pan hard rod.

Hope this helps

Regards,
Andy

On 17 Jul 2013, at 17:15, "Steinpom" <steinpom@shaw.ca> wrote:

Peter, thanks once again. The front suspension is less of a mystery than the rear, but everything helps.

Danny

Show quoted textHide quoted text

From: MarcosManiacs@yahoogroups.com [mailto:MarcosManiacs@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of P Fischer
Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2013 11:35 PM
To: MarcosManiacs@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [MarcosManiacs] 1600 GT rear suspension chassis - 5201 [1 Attachment]

[Attachment(s) from P Fischer included below]

and one more

----- Original Message -----

From: Steinpom

Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2013 4:04 PM

Subject: RE: [MarcosManiacs] 1600 GT rear suspension chassis - 5201

Hello Richard,

I would really appreciate some photos, especially of the panhard rod connections and the area around the rear shock mounts. I still have the old mounts which were slightly twisted when I took them off as they seem to have been made from a fairly light guage sheet metal with no gussets or other stiffeners. I had much heavier ones made up which I also still have. Speaking only from memory, I seem to recall that there was another bracket that was also mounted with one of the shock mount bolts and then an additional bolt. Does your car have this, or is my mind playing tricks. If its there what is it for? I was such an idiot for not taking photos – but I did anticipate the car being put back together right away at that time. Having now restored 2 other cars I now know these projects can be measured in decades unless tackled almost full-time.

Anyhow much gratitude for any help. Pictures of my car in pieces can be seen on marcosmaniacs.

Danny

From: MarcosManiacs@yahoogroups.com [mailto:MarcosManiacs@yahoo groups.com] On Behalf Of Richard Brengman
Sent: Sunday, July 14, 2013 12:08 AM
To: MarcosManiacs@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [MarcosManiacs] 1600 GT rear suspension chassis - 5201

I have not taken mine very far apart yet.

Rear suspension is still all original and intact.

Pics will be awkward but possible since it's in an attic.

Actually pretty simple, odd arrangement to the locating arms but it works fine until the mount s begin to auger out.

You will want to reinforce the attachments.

Loads of info on the wood chassis cars at the U.K. Marcos site, http://marcossportscarenthusiasts.yuku.com/

They are particularly fond of the wood cars.

There is a full restoration thread there with loads of excellent pictures.




On Jul 13, 2013, at 11:08 PM, Steinpom wrote:




Hello Peter,

Great to get such a quick response. My problem is that I took the car apart (it was complete when I got it) about 25 at least years ago.. like most people I did not anticipate so many years to pass before getting back to the project. I foolishly did not take many photos as it was coming apart. Then a young friend of my kids decided to do me a favour and tidy up the variou s piles of car parts I had in the basement and garage. What he did not realize was that parts were in various locations because they belonged to various cars I have. Hard to get mad at someone who’s trying to do a favour but…. Anyhow, time and the mixing up of parts has not ma! de the restoration any easier. I’m told that there never was an official factory build manual for this model, but I’m hoping someone has a lead on something. I have a number of TORQUE club magazines which have some info, but maybe one I don’t have would be more to the point. Enough ranting for tonight. Copies of any pictures you might still have of the 1600 mechanicals or suspension would be nice.

Danny

From: MarcosManiacs@yahoogroups.com [mailto:MarcosManiacs@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of P Fischer
Sent: Saturday, July 13, 2013 10:42 PM
To: MarcosManiacs@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [MarcosManiacs] 1600 GT rear suspension chassis - 5201

Hi Danny

No idea if this reaches you, but here we go. I owned a 67 wooden chassis and regret for ever selling it.

around 40 years after, I have now imported a steel chassis 3.9ltr around 80 model from GB. And it exhibits all the flaws I always knew about. Heavy as, with an engine that has not zip (albeit 3.9 ltr) and a feel like driving a tank. The wooden chasis GT1600 I owned was nimble as.

But as to details? I am now amazed at how little information is available about any of these cars. And I mean in detail: what is the rear axle, the front suspension, and so on. My earlier GT1600 had a Ford rear axle (a Ford 1660 engine and gear box and GT6, Herald or Spitfire front end stuff.

chers

Peter

----- Original Message -----

Sent:< /span> Sunday, July 14, 2013 3:15 PM

Subject: [MarcosManiacs] 1600 GT rear suspension chassis - 5201

After about 25 years of being apart I'm about to try and gather up all the parts and do a loose reassembly of the car to see if I still have all the pieces. The ca! r will then be taken apart again to finish the body restoration and get painted. The immediate need is for some detailed photos and/or diagrams of the rear suspension and associated brackets etc etc for a wood hulled 1600 GT. Any other manuals or instructions would be most appreciated. The only build manual I can find on the internet is for the later tube frame chassis. Were there significant changes to the suspension when the GT went from wood chassis to metal tube?

Thanks for the tips, advise and wisdom.

Danny

RE: [MarcosManiacs] 1600 GT rear suspension chassis - 5201

2013-07-17 by Steinpom

Andy,

 

Your information is extremely helpful and did trigger my memory about what else was bolted by the shock mount.  I’ll keep you in mind if I need more advice as we try to piece this car back together again.

 

Thanks,

 

Danny
Show quoted textHide quoted text
From: MarcosManiacs@yahoogroups.com [mailto:MarcosManiacs@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of andy derrick
Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2013 12:47 AM
To: MarcosManiacs@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [MarcosManiacs] 1600 GT rear suspension chassis - 5201

 

  

Hi Danny

 

I don't have any pics as I'm in Aus and my car (1500gt 1966) is in the UK but hopefully this can be helpful as I rebuilt all suspension some years ago.

 

As a starter and I'm sure you know. Post 65 front suspension is triumph GT6. Wishbones also off of spitfire / herald and vitesse. Uprights are purely GT6/vitesse as calliper mounts are different than spitfire. Steering rack is GT6/Vitesse with a one inch space inserted to restrict full lock hitting the headlamp bowls. Critical if you have an original short bonnet. 

 

Rear suspension consists of two identical vertical shock upper mounts which have from memory 4 bolt fixings into chassis with captives in the chassis to connect them to. I think the lowest bolt also holds the steel bar which goes across the car between both mounts.

 

Lower shock mounts bolt to modified ford cortina axle

 

Panhard rod has rose bush that slides onto axle stud on one side. Other side bolts to a horizontal steel mount which bolts with captive nuts into the lower boot area . This also has a bolt inside the axle tunnel to stop movement

 

The trailing arms have split half bushes to mount on the axle ( one arm is adjustable) and then small rubber donout bushes on top arm bolting through vertical wooden chassis panel at rear of car and larger do outs on the bottom arm. The holes in the wood often elongate and cause handling issues and are often badly repaired.

 

Not sure if this is any help. It's pretty easy and if you need bushes , Rory at marcos heritage in the UK has them. He also can supply mounts and trailing arms. I made my mounts out of stainless but stuck with steel arms and pan hard rod.

 

Hope this helps


Regards, 

Andy


On 17 Jul 2013, at 17:15, "Steinpom" <steinpom@...> wrote:

  

Peter, thanks once again.  The front suspension is less of a mystery than the rear, but everything helps.

 

Danny

 

From: MarcosManiacs@yahoogroups.com [mailto:MarcosManiacs@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of P Fischer
Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2013 11:35 PM
To: MarcosManiacs@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [MarcosManiacs] 1600 GT rear suspension chassis - 5201 [1 Attachment]

 

  

[Attachment(s) from P Fischer included below] 

and one more

 

 

----- Original Message ----- 

From: Steinpom <mailto:steinpom@...>  

To: MarcosManiacs@yahoogroups.com 

Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2013 4:04 PM

Subject: RE: [MarcosManiacs] 1600 GT rear suspension chassis - 5201

 

  

Hello Richard,

I would really appreciate some photos, especially of the panhard rod connections and the area around the rear shock   mounts.  I still have the old mounts which were slightly twisted when I took them off as they seem to have been made from a fairly light guage sheet metal with no gussets or other stiffeners.  I had much heavier ones made up which I also still have.  Speaking only from memory, I seem to recall that there was another bracket that was also mounted with one of the shock mount bolts and then an additional bolt.  Does your car have this, or is my mind playing tricks.  If its there what is it for?  I was such an idiot for not taking photos – but I did anticipate the car being put back together right away at that time.  Having now restored 2 other cars I now know these projects can be measured in decades unless tackled almost full-time.

Anyhow much gratitude for any help.  Pictures of my car in pieces can be seen on marcosmaniacs.

Danny 

From: MarcosManiacs@yahoogroups.com [mailto:MarcosManiacs@yahoo groups.com <mailto:MarcosManiacs@yahoo%20groups.com> ] On Behalf Of Richard Brengman
Sent: Sunday, July 14, 2013 12:08 AM
To: MarcosManiacs@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [MarcosManiacs] 1600 GT rear suspension chassis - 5201

  

I have not taken mine very far apart yet.

Rear suspension is still all original and intact.

Pics will be awkward but possible since it's in an attic.

Actually pretty simple, odd arrangement to the locating arms but it works fine until the mount s begin to auger out.

You will want to reinforce the attachments.

Loads of info on the wood chassis cars at the U.K. Marcos site, http://marcossportscarenthusiasts.yuku.com/ 

They are particularly fond of the wood cars.

There is a full restoration thread there with loads of excellent pictures.







On Jul 13, 2013, at 11:08 PM, Steinpom wrote:







  

Hello Peter,

Great to get such a quick response.  My problem is that I took the car apart (it was complete when I got it) about 25 at least years ago.. like most people I did not anticipate so many years to pass before getting back to the project.  I foolishly did not take many photos as it was coming apart.  Then a young friend of my kids decided to do me a favour and tidy up the variou s piles of car parts I had in the basement and garage.  What he did not realize was that parts were in various locations because they belonged to various cars I have.  Hard to get mad at someone who’s trying to do a favour but….  Anyhow, time and the mixing up of parts has not ma! de the restoration any easier.  I’m told that there never was an official factory build manual for this model, but I’m hoping someone has a lead on something.  I have a number of TORQUE club magazines which have some info, but maybe one I don’t have would be more to the point.  Enough ranting for tonight.  Copies of any pictures you might still have of the 1600 mechanicals or suspension would be nice.

Danny

From: MarcosManiacs@yahoogroups.com [mailto:MarcosManiacs@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of P Fischer
Sent: Saturday, July 13, 2013 10:42 PM
To: MarcosManiacs@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [MarcosManiacs] 1600 GT rear suspension chassis - 5201

  

Hi Danny

No idea if this reaches you, but here we go. I owned a 67 wooden chassis and regret for ever selling it.

around 40 years after, I have now imported a steel chassis 3.9ltr around 80 model from GB. And it exhibits all the flaws I always knew about. Heavy as, with an engine that has not zip (albeit 3.9 ltr) and a feel like driving a tank.  The wooden chasis GT1600 I owned was nimble as. 

But as to details? I am now amazed at how little information is available about any of these cars. And I mean in detail: what is the rear axle, the front suspension, and so on. My earlier GT1600 had a Ford rear axle (a Ford 1660 engine and gear box and GT6, Herald or Spitfire front end stuff.

chers

Peter

----- Original Message ----- 

From: steinpom@shaw.ca 

To: MarcosManiacs@yahoogroups.com 

Sent:< /span> Sunday, July 14, 2013 3:15 PM

Subject: [MarcosManiacs] 1600 GT rear suspension chassis - 5201

  

After about 25 years of being apart I'm about to try and gather up all the parts and do a loose reassembly of the car to see if I still have all the pieces. The ca! r will then be taken apart again to finish the body restoration and get painted. The immediate need is for some detailed photos and/or diagrams of the rear suspension and associated brackets etc etc for a wood hulled 1600 GT. Any other manuals or instructions would be most appreciated. The only build manual I can find on the internet is for the later tube frame chassis. Were there significant changes to the suspension when the GT went from wood chassis to metal tube?

Thanks for the tips, advise and wisdom.

Danny


  _____  



Spam <https://antispam.roaringpenguin.com/canit/b.php?i=02K068b1j&m=625e408cd6a3&t=20130714&c=s> 
Not spam <https://antispam.roaringpenguin.com/canit/b.php?i=02K068b1j&m=625e408cd6a3&t=20130714&c=n> 
Forget previous vote <https://antispam.roaringpenguin.com/canit/b.php?i=02K068b1j&m=625e408cd6a3&t=20130714&c=f>

Re: 1600 GT rear suspension chassis - 5201

2013-07-17 by MarkD

Danny if the photos of my rebuild of 3/5349 would help I have a file in the photo section on the complete restoration. I took many photos along the path and there are three or four of the rear end area. You will also find a photo or two of all the metal brackets and bits which were blasted and power coated. If I can help with any identification give me a shout. My car was a later 3L wood chassis.

Good luck as you begin the journey of rebuild.
Mark

RE: [MarcosManiacs] 1600 GT rear suspension chassis - 5201

2013-07-18 by Steinpom

Richard,

 

Your pictures came through very nicely and show how things go together.
Thanks.   Could you please explain what the perspective is in photo 488.  Is
it the trailing arm looking slightly forward and across the underside?  I
can't figure out how its related to 486 or 484.   What's the triangular
structure under the arm?

 

Looking forward to hearing from you,

 

Danny
Show quoted textHide quoted text
From: MarcosManiacs@yahoogroups.com [mailto:MarcosManiacs@yahoogroups.com]
On Behalf Of Richard Brengman
Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2013 1:02 PM
To: MarcosManiacs@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [MarcosManiacs] 1600 GT rear suspension chassis - 5201

 

Danny,

 

Not great pics, and the surface rust is not helping, but I hope they help.

Re: [MarcosManiacs] 1600 GT rear suspension chassis - 5201

2013-07-18 by Richard Brengman

Danny,

Pic 488 is primarily the attachment for the panhard rod which runs cross-wise from the axle to the left side rear.
Pic is from outside the wheel well looking in.

Light areas in that pic are the floor, I should have had better light but that side faces the wall.

Richard Brengman
1422-A Industrial Way
Gardnerville, NV 89410






On Jul 17, 2013, at 11:49 PM, Steinpom wrote:


Richard,

Your pictures came through very nicely and show how things go together. Thanks. Could you please explain what the perspective is in photo 488. Is it the trailing arm looking slightly forward and across the underside? I can’t figure out how its related to 486 or 484. What’s the triangular structure under the arm?

Looking forward to hearing from you,

! Danny

From: MarcosManiacs@yahoogroups.com [mailto:MarcosManiacs@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Richard Brengman
Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2013 1:02 PM
To: MarcosManiacs@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [MarcosManiacs] 1600 GT rear suspension chassis - 5201

Danny,

Not great pics, and the surface rust is not helping, but I hope they help.



Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.