Mellotronists

do you mean like this?

http://www.mellotron.com/soundframe.htm

The sampling rate subject has been hashed to death on
this list, but the Pinder ROM still sounds miles
better than the M-Tron junk. Those choirs are just
ROTTEN.

Mark


--- Bernie Kornowicz <kornowicz@...> wrote:

> 
> --- In Mellotronists@yahoogroups.com, "Dagfinn H" 
> <captain_yossarian@h...> wrote:
> > On the topic of software emulation, it would be
> interesting to get 
> a poll 
> > going - what are the group's feelings about the
> software 
> alternatives? Also, 
> > perhaps a software comparison is in order? M-Tron
> vs. the various 
> sample 
> > libraries like Pinder's, etc.?
> > 
> > Just a thought. Actually, two.
> > 
> > Regards,
> > 
> > Dagfinn
> > 
> >
>
_________________________________________________________________
> > MSN Hotmail http://www.hotmail.com Med markedets
> beste SPAM-
> filter. Gratis!
> 
> Dagfinn,
> 
> I'm using Cubase VST 5.1 to run M-Tron. For me it's
> a nice addition  
> of over 100 sounds since I only have 6 sounds
> between my 2 M400's. 
> I'm also using Halion for samples of my own Trons,
> the Primesounds 
> Mellotron samples and other Tron samples I've
> recently gotten on 
> eBay. I've been considering getting the Pinder CD
> for the Chamberlin 
> samples since I've heard that Halion can import AKAI
> format samples, 
> but I'm a little ambivalent because of the low
> sample rate. I 
> sampled my Trons at 44100 and dropped the sample
> rate to 22050 
> (which I think the Pinder samples are) for a
> comparison and there is 
> a big difference in the sound.
> 
> It would be nice if we could upload some random note
> unprocessed 
> samples of each sample set so we could all hear the
> differences. 
> Maybe 3 violins low G, a midkey note and a high
> note.
> 
> Bernie
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 



		
__________________________________ 
Do you Yahoo!? 
Check out the new Yahoo! Front Page. 
www.yahoo.com