Jack Younger wrote: > Hey folks! > I know this is going to open some debate, but I would love to get some serious > feedback/opinion on this quandry. Given a choice, what would be the advantages of > owning a MK2 over a Chamberlin 600/660, and vice-versa? Which one would you > pick and why? -Jack Younger E4/103S "The Bastard" ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Greetings Jack and everyone, I own an early Mellotron (MK1 #124), and wouldn't part with dear "Julia" for all the tea in China (or beer in England) , but would love the opportunity to "tinker" with a Musicmaster 600 . After all, the Mellotron was derived from that model. Chamberlin tapes had an interesting mix of SFX as well as the lead sounds . One appeared on eBay a few years ago I believe . Their weakest link (pun intended) was/is the cycling system. The Musicmaster 600 for me would purely be a collector's /restorer's instrument for preservation . While the MK2's are made to be played ........ I cannot offer detailed tech insights on the Chamb-600 , only the MK2. ....Wish I could ....... Cheers, -- JK -- (tinkering with 1960-era German SW radios at the moment)
Message
Re: [Mellotronists] MK2 or Chamberlin?
2005-03-29 by Jerry Korb
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.