Mellotronists

I think Clay has the correct take on matter. It would be a dull world if (in 
this case for example) we all agreed on the definition of progressive rock 
let alone the specific artists.
To each their own comes to mind. And I could go on and on too which drives 
home the point.

Tony
#510
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "ceccles_ca" <clay123@...>
To: <Mellotronists@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Sunday, August 28, 2005 12:12 PM
Subject: [Mellotronists] absurd list


>I agree Bernie.  That's why I sent it.
> If Rush and Tool are "Prog", why isn't Led Zepplin?
>
> I'm sure we could all make a list of recordings that are missing from
> the list.  Everyone has a different idea about what "prog" is.
>
> Here's my bizarre brian dump:
>
> Hackett and Gabriel solo material?  (Kind of proggy!)
> 10CC - How Dare You or Original Soundtrack?  (Quite progressive!)
> Ultravox - Vienna?  (totally prog!)
> Brian Eno - Before and After Science?  (beyond prog)
> The Tubes - Remote Control?
> ELO's Eldorado?
> Early Bowie?
> Todd Rundgren - Todd or A Wizard a True Star?
>
> I could go on and on...
>
> Clay
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
>