Mellotronists group photo

Yahoo Groups archive

Mellotronists

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 23:09 UTC

Thread

Re: [Mellotronists] New Frame/Tapes,Same Old Banter......

Re: [Mellotronists] New Frame/Tapes,Same Old Banter......

2006-05-18 by Jerry Korb

mark kasian wrote:

> It's not an assumption. It's a fact- ONE guy stepped
> up to the plate with a 50,000.00 investment to rescue
> the tapes from a leaking attic in Sutton Coldfield.
> The main parts inventory was headed for a dump in
> Destin Florida. BOTH of the previous companies had
> gone BANKRUPT trying to support the old instruments.
>
> Woulda, shoulda, coulda isn't worth a shilling, but
> you have to give credit (yes even you Martin) to the
> guy for trying something so risky just for the love of
> the instrument.
>
> He did the same thing for the Gleeman Pentaphonic, ran
> a huge demographic study and supplied the early
> prototypes for the Moog Vogager, financed the initial
> run of 200e modules from Buchla, rescued the Emu
> document archive from a trash heap. Where is the FIRST
> portable synth (EMS Putney)? Calgary. Rolling Stones
> Moblie? Calgary. ALL at a NON-profit studio for ANYONE
> to use.

______________________________________________________________

All this info is well-known , Mark  . Anybody who's chatted with and met
DK in the "earlier" years  knows of his selfless efforts to keep legacies alive
of the misc. intruments mentioned.  But it's good that you inform some
newer members of our List, hopefully without alienating/angering  others .

Important thing to remember is that all that financial outlay of DK's in late
1980's
needs some return on investment .  The free/cheap parts from DK in the beginning

gave way to real monetary concerns .  No way in hell could  I shell-out
$50K and let it languish.   What began as a "hobby" in Moses Lake, WA,
gave-way to an international business of preserving,displaying and now building
Trons.
.....No spin there......

________________________________________________________________

>
> We alienated the wrong crew on this list and if you
> and John had NEVER met or if Les hadn't passed away,
> he and Kean would probably still be friends. And don't
> give me a bunch of grief about "stirring up the pot"
> here kids...JK, Markus and Martin are spinning the
> topic to their own ends, this MY 2 bits. I am saying
> it because DK is sitting on BAGS of red lense caps, MK
> II front plates, knobs, blah blah blah and the guys on
> this list have made that stuff un-available to us with
> such a lack of TOLERANCE, respect, humor and a blind
> disregard of the FACTS.

__________________________________________________________________

I don't see a spin in stating my observations of  loosely threaded
longer MA tapes on older M400 frames .  As mentioned, there
was no inference that anyone in the MA organization was the reason.
....The customers/end-users themselves .

If Dave Kean  is stockpiling those needed parts mentioned,
(add to that all those Bulgin M400/MK-V knobs and M400 front plates
removed during Sound Sales "enhancements") ,  any   RFQ's  should be
answered  from all potential customers/owners.

We're all maxed-out on tape-heads right now.....

________________________________________________________________


>
> Thank God for the stuff that has been written down
> elsewhere because the empirical body of knowledge that
> Terry Kelley, Steve Frothingham, Brian Kehew, Gary
> Hahlbeck, Jim Herbst, Jim Blair, Damon Fox, Ron
> Skinner and DK could have brought to this list will
> forever be lost now. Pity.  --  Mark.

________________________________________________________________

With the exception of Jimmy Herbst and Ron Skinner,
I've had pleasant email chats with all the above in the last
8-9 years. You forgot Robert A. Laughton , who produced some M400
control panels,decals and bronze models back then.  Another dedicated follower
of the Moses Lake gang . And who sold me "Julia" in 1998.
A casual exchange of tech-info,anecdotes, some humorous
tales, etc.  None of the same old banter I keep hearing from the same people.

In fact, I  received a very nice,sincere detailed message
from Dave Kean on March-08-2006.  I respectfully asked about Jimmy Herbst
(who passed-away in 2003) , as I have his MK-II here for some R&R.

No animosity, no barbs, no cynicism, and no spin  whatsoever from Dave.
Quite different from the stuff slingshot from a select  few on this List,
towards people who follow their own paths for decades and will never
have a mansion, Bentley, Learjet (or WANT TO)  for their efforts.
.....One Tron at a time back to life , and maybe a LITTLE thanks of
recognition for all the selfless effort/research , should suffice.

David Jacques'  follow-up summary says it quite well. Many thanks, David.

I see no  need to defend/justify my 38 year love for the Mellotron
any further.   !Viva Mellotron !

--Jerry Korb (w.flak jacket just in case)

Re: [Mellotronists] New Frame/Tapes,Same Old Banter......

2006-05-18 by lsf5275@aol.com

In a message dated 5/18/2006 2:23:36 P.M. Eastern Standard Time,  
jkorb@... writes:

I see no  need to defend/justify my 38 year love for the  Mellotron 
any further.   !Viva Mellotron !  
--Jerry Korb (w.flak jacket just in case) 


Elegantly and thoughtfully stated, Jerry. Thank you for your knowledge and  
dedication. I think it is sad that there is any infighting at all. It would be  
nice to get Dave and some of the other guys mentioned herein back on the 
list.  Although an old (long ago ) Tronist myself, it is through guys like you, 
Dave,  Martin, Markus, Frank Samagaio, Ken Leonard, etc. That I have gained so 
much  history and filled in many of the gaps in my knowledge. I am thankful for 
this  trust. We are all a human encyclopedia of knowledge and ability. We 
should exist  together within this trust and work to build our common bond. 
 
Let's recognize what we all share and be thankful for it. Then let's think  
about what can be done to get the "old" guys back here.
 
Frank II

Re: [Mellotronists] New Frame/Tapes,Same Old Banter......

2006-05-18 by mark kasian

That's the most sensible post I have ever read on this
board. And thanks for your reply too Jerry. The "spin"
I was referring to was not aimed at your enthusiasm or
your discussion about the tape length. It was about
the topic of "what if" and felt like people were
lamenting what DID happen with the company. Sorry if I
misunderstood your intentions. 

Getting those guys back on board (without any pissing
contests) would be welcome indeed.

--- lsf5275@... wrote:

>  
> In a message dated 5/18/2006 2:23:36 P.M. Eastern
> Standard Time,  
> jkorb@... writes:
> 
> I see no  need to defend/justify my 38 year love for
> the  Mellotron 
> any further.   !Viva Mellotron !  
> --Jerry Korb (w.flak jacket just in case) 
> 
> 
> Elegantly and thoughtfully stated, Jerry. Thank you
> for your knowledge and  
> dedication. I think it is sad that there is any
> infighting at all. It would be  
> nice to get Dave and some of the other guys
> mentioned herein back on the 
> list.  Although an old (long ago ) Tronist myself,
> it is through guys like you, 
> Dave,  Martin, Markus, Frank Samagaio, Ken Leonard,
> etc. That I have gained so 
> much  history and filled in many of the gaps in my
> knowledge. I am thankful for 
> this  trust. We are all a human encyclopedia of
> knowledge and ability. We 
> should exist  together within this trust and work to
> build our common bond. 
>  
> Let's recognize what we all share and be thankful
> for it. Then let's think  
> about what can be done to get the "old" guys back
> here.
>  
> Frank II
> 


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com

Re: [Mellotronists] New Frame/Tapes,Same Old Banter......

2006-05-18 by Paul Marshall

Evening all,
'DK is sitting on BAGS of... red lense caps' !
Ooh, can I have a red lens cap please????
Paul Marshall
M400 #1380 (soon to be M400SM #1380... cheers Martin & John... now with new preamp power supply of my own design, nice & cool & quiet).

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.