Yes, Thanks to both of you. You guys are great! --- In ModularSynthPanels@yahoogroups.com, "adaaxs" <wonggster@...> wrote: > > That is very cool of you Thomas. I just love that design. I can even see the MOTM purists > knucling under dor it. I see your concern about the wiring. MFOS in gereal has an issue > with rat's nest wiring overall. > > My Evenfall minimodular had a sandwich board with pots facing the panel, it was a mess: > lining them up was a problem and then using better or different components became an > issue. Edge connectors with some sort of harnessor headers ala haible may be a better > solution. Then again once you get past musing I am sure I will be hugely impressed. > > While Scott is at it, I have to thank this kind and very generous group of people. Every > concern or dumb idea I bring up gets addressed often privately and very honestly. A good > group of gentleman (and women). > > best > > gino > > > > > > I have no problem whatsoever with my panel being open source. That's > > how it is anyway with the MFOS list. I would want one of course Scott ;) > > > > I have received so many emails about it I have often thought of > > getting a custom PCB designed that has pcb mounted pots and sitches to > > eliminate the crazy amount of wiring. It would be like a sandwich > > module with panel-pot/switch pcb-Rays didigtal/analog pcbs. It would > > make building them in limited production runs much cheaper and I would > > want a couple more for myself. No time or resources though. > > > > Run with the panel design. Let me know how I can help out at all. The > > panel file (fpd) is up on the MFOS yahoo group. Thanks guys, > > > > Thomas > > > > --- In ModularSynthPanels@yahoogroups.com, Scott Deyo <contact@> wrote: > > > > > > I'm game. > > > > > > Would Thomas mind if I stole his X/ Y's ? > > > : ) > > > > > > I must say, I do appreciate how much thought and work goes into the > > > panels that I shamelessly exploit. > > > Thanks to Thomas, David, Bill and Will, Richard, Gino, Mr.Mike. Who am > > > I forgetting? > > > > > > And I agree, FPE/ Schaeffer is way too expensive for that paintjob. It > > > didn't use to be so expensive. > > > > > > Scott Deyo > > > The Bridechamber > > > contact@ > > > www.bridechamber.com > > > > > > > > > On Mar 29, 2008, at 1:38 AM, David Moylan wrote: > > > > > > > I would love to see this panel. > > > > > > > > Dave > > > > > > > > andrewlistmayer wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hey Scott, I was just wondering if you ever considered doing a run > > > > of > > > > > panels for Thomas White`s rotary MFOS step sequencer? I decided to > > > > > make this question public in case anyone else wants to chime in and > > > > > cajole you a bit ;) Judging by the prices of your slightly oversize > > > > > panels(and even ignoring the astonishingly inexpensive CGS event > > > > > sequencer panel) maybe you could do it for around $60 give or take? > > > > > That would be a great deal cheaper than Schaeffer(whose prices are > > > > > outrageous IMO)Thanks. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
Message
Re: Bridechamber Thomas White sequencer panel?
2008-04-08 by andrewlistmayer
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.