Yes, the LFO MODE switch matches what JH has in the schematics (and his prototype). Looks like you have everything accounted for. Thanks for doing this. When I get the PCBs I will build it to this layout and let you know if the BPOL switch is worth having or not. Also, I have some different ideas about how to implement the V/OCT tweak pot. I might need to add a MUUB board for a buffer or two. On 2-Oct-09, at 11:33 PM, wjhall11 wrote: > How's this look > > http://www.dragonflyalley.com/images/JHSOSTFlanger/JHSOSTFlangerV4vIIwidth2-56in.jpg > > Did I place the LFO Modes correctly? I was just guessing. > > > --- In ModularSynthPanels@yahoogroups.com, "wjhall11" <wjhall@...> > wrote: >> >> Ok - I see how we could easily use one dpdt for the bypass switch. >> We were interpreting Jurgen's "schematic 6" literally. The DPDT >> idea looks better. If the switch hole is centered 1/2in from the >> edge, it would still be possible for people to use a 4 pole switch >> if they wanted to. >> >> There really isn't room for two rows of switches - at least not to >> my eye... but I just did a trial and I think we could get all the >> switches in. I'll post it later. >> >> >> >> >> >> --- In ModularSynthPanels@yahoogroups.com, Scott Juskiw <scott@> >> wrote: >>> >>> I wasn't planning on using a 4PDT switch for bypass. My plan is to >>> use >>> a regular 2PDT switch connected to just the outputs: in the active >>> position the outputs are connected to the flanger outputs, in the >>> bypass position the outputs are connected to the inputs. This means >>> the inputs are always connected to the flanger, even in bypass mode, >>> but I see no significant disadvantage in doing so, and a significant >>> advantage in that I can use a regular switch. But if you really want >>> the inputs to switch as well, then I agree with you that two 2PDT >>> switches is probably a better choice than a 4PDT. >>> >>> Panel mount trimmer? Hmm, I'm not so keen on having to dig out a >>> little screwdriver every time I need to tweak the 1V/OCT setting. >>> I'd >>> probably wind up scratching the panel with the screwdriver tip. I >>> say >>> make it a pot (maybe a small knob), or leave it out entirely. Maybe >>> it's not even worth adding. I'll have to try it out when I get the >>> PCB. >>> >>> Can you put the switches into two rows? >>> >>> On 2-Oct-09, at 12:43 PM, wjhall11 wrote: >>> >>>> The hard constraint so far as the row of switches is concerned is >>>> only that the BYPASS switch is 1/2in from the edge of the panel >>>> because it's a 4PDT switch and needs the space. >>>> >>>> BTW, let's all remember that it only comes as a regular "bat" >>>> toggle >>>> rather than the flattened ones that are MOTM standard. Will was >>>> considering disassembling a MOTM standard SPDP switch to see if we >>>> could transplant the toggle (assuming matching blood-types). >>>> >>>> At any rate - the point is that wherever that bypass switch is >>>> placed (it makes sense to be either the left or right extreme), it >>>> needs about 1/2 in on either side of its center. Other than that >>>> there's plenty of room for another switch like the On-Off-On >>>> (M201302) switch Scott's mentioning. >>>> >>>> OK - well - there's another possibility re the bypass switch - use >>>> two DPDT 201202 switches - one for left, one for right. I'm >>>> starting to like that idea better. >>>> >>>> But anyway - Scott - could the 1V/oct tweak function be handled >>>> by a >>>> panel-mount trim pot a-la the Living VCO? (Trimmer (assumes 100K): >>>> Mouser# 594-43P104 and Panel-mount: Mouser# 594-611) That would >>>> save space on the panel, too. >>>> >>>> If BYPASS is implemented with two switches, LFO MODE with an on- >>>> off- >>>> on, and a BPOL switch added, I think we could still fit it all >>>> nicely if we use a panel mount trimmer for 1V/oct rather than a >>>> pot- >>>> and-knob. >>>> >>>> Just thinking. >>>> >>>> Bill >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> --- In ModularSynthPanels@yahoogroups.com, Scott Juskiw <scott@> >>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> I don't have the PCBs yet but I'm already working out some of the >>>>> details for this module. Bill and Will already have a panel >>>>> proposed >>>>> for this (search for "flanger" on this page): >>>>> >>>>> http://www.dragonflyalley.com/billAndWillMOTMSynth.htm >>>>> >>>>> which I like, but there are some options to consider. >>>>> >>>>> 1. You don't need a rotary switch for LFO MODE. You can use one of >>>>> those 3 position centre-off switches. This frees up pot space >>>>> for a >>>>> 1V/ >>>>> Oct tweak pot (this is shown as an option in the schematics). JH >>>>> has >>>>> mentioned (on an electro-music forum) that the 1V/Oct tracking >>>>> is not >>>>> so good, so having a front panel pot may be a good idea. >>>>> 2. Can add a jack for LFO OUT (will likely need to add a buffer as >>>>> well). This would be post-LFO MODE switch, so the output will be >>>>> either ramp, slewed square, or S&H depending on LFO MODE setting. >>>>> 3. There is a BPOL (bounce polarity) switch on the schematic. >>>>> Hmmm, >>>>> first one who builds one of these will have to let us know if it's >>>>> worth implementing or not. >>>>> >>>>> I'm still trying to figure out how best to hook up the LED. >>>>> Should it >>>>> indicate the LFO (i.e. post-LFO MODE switch) or the total delay >>>>> time? >>>>> This doesn't change the panel layout. I'll need to try out >>>>> different >>>>> things after I get the boards in. >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> ------------------------------------ >>>> >>>> Yahoo! Groups Links >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >> > > > > > ------------------------------------ > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > >
Message
Re: [ModularSynthPanels] Re: SOST Flanger panel discussion
2009-10-03 by Scott Juskiw
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.