--- Roger Rossen <mididood@...> wrote: > And perhaps I have tunnel vision from being primarily MOTM-based, > yet it does SEEM, at least, that gravity is swaying that > way...?!?! At least in the Western hemisphere.... Roger, I really see two significant camps with variations on both sides. Camp one: large format like MOTM, Oakley, Synthesizers.com. Modcan. Camp two: frac rack format like Blacet, Paia, some Wiard, D*epfer, Analog Sys. Primarily those camps seem divided over the same issue. Small space with cramped quarters verses plenty of room on a too big synth. I say it is kind of like the PC vs. Mac thing. There is no right answer, only personal preference. So, looks like guys like me and companies like Schaeffer are going to have plenty of format conversion work... until (drum roll)..... Some of the manufacturers wise up and start releasing their product in both formats.... GASP !! > Ok - I'll shut-up now - Thanks again! Oh sure. Like we believe that. <snicker> About as likely as me doing the same. :) Larry Hendry (loud mouth Stooge) __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? New Yahoo! Photos - easier uploading and sharing. http://photos.yahoo.com/
Message
Re: [motmpanels] Any CGS/MOTM panels worth blackmailing for?
2003-12-08 by Larry Hendry
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.