PLAN B analog blog

I'd say go for the upgrade, but definitely make it switchable between
retrigger and non-retrigger modes.  It only double-triggers when using
the panel-switch?  Both modes are useful, obviously.

On Jan 31, 2008 1:01 AM, James Cigler <jamescigler@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>
> Hi Peter,
> I rather love the fact that the M10 does not retrigger.
> This combined with the modulation of the time base has lead me to
> sounds I would not have otherwise discovered.
>
> That being said, if I did want to use it in a more where I could retrigger,
> I would *not* want it to fire off two cycles of the envelope.
>
> -james
>
> On Jan 30, 2008, at 4:14 PM, "(i think you can figure that out)"
> <peter@buzzclick-music.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> Guys,
>
>  I have successfully retrofit the M10 so it retriggers, meaning it will
>  start another cycle before the previous one is completed. But there
>  is a caveat:
>
>  When this mode is engaged, the START switch gives two envelopes. To
>  make this go away the entire input section would need a redesign.
>  it's not a simple issue of switch debouncing.
>
>  I was thinking of incorporating this feature with a switch, so not to
>  loose the non=retrig operation which i think has it's use. WHen in
>  non-retrig mode, the START switch works correctly.
>
>  My question to you all: How would you feel if it did double cycle
>  with a manual start when in RETRIG mode?
>
>  BTW...I could easily make a boardlette and sell it as a retrofit
>  option so that older M10's could be modified to operate this way.
>
>  let me know about this and thanks,
>
>  - P
>
>
>  ________________________________
> Looking for last minute shopping deals? Find them fast with Yahoo! Search.
>