PLAN B analog blog

Switchable sounds hot to me.

On Thu, Jan 31, 2008 at 12:14:07PM +0000, Norman Fay wrote:
> I'd say go for the upgrade, but definitely make it switchable between
> retrigger and non-retrigger modes.  It only double-triggers when using
> the panel-switch?  Both modes are useful, obviously.
> 
> On Jan 31, 2008 1:01 AM, James Cigler <jamescigler@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> > Hi Peter,
> > I rather love the fact that the M10 does not retrigger.
> > This combined with the modulation of the time base has lead me to
> > sounds I would not have otherwise discovered.
> >
> > That being said, if I did want to use it in a more where I could retrigger,
> > I would *not* want it to fire off two cycles of the envelope.
> >
> > -james
> >
> > On Jan 30, 2008, at 4:14 PM, "(i think you can figure that out)"
> > <peter@buzzclick-music.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Guys,
> >
> >  I have successfully retrofit the M10 so it retriggers, meaning it will
> >  start another cycle before the previous one is completed. But there
> >  is a caveat:
> >
> >  When this mode is engaged, the START switch gives two envelopes. To
> >  make this go away the entire input section would need a redesign.
> >  it's not a simple issue of switch debouncing.
> >
> >  I was thinking of incorporating this feature with a switch, so not to
> >  loose the non=retrig operation which i think has it's use. WHen in
> >  non-retrig mode, the START switch works correctly.
> >
> >  My question to you all: How would you feel if it did double cycle
> >  with a manual start when in RETRIG mode?
> >
> >  BTW...I could easily make a boardlette and sell it as a retrofit
> >  option so that older M10's could be modified to operate this way.
> >
> >  let me know about this and thanks,
> >
> >  - P
> >
> >
> >  ________________________________
> > Looking for last minute shopping deals? Find them fast with Yahoo! Search.
> > 
> 
> 
>  
> Yahoo! Groups Links
> 
> 
>