PLAN B analog blog

I rather like the AH requirement. Everyone in the buisness thinks it,
it's nice to see someone enact it.

On Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 3:24 PM, loopcycle <loopcycle@yahoo.com> wrote:
> after i looked up AH in the urban dictionary i had a little chuckle,
> mostly because i pictured a couple recent conversations in
> modular-land that were pretty ridiculous and ran for far too long
> having something to do with tracking.
>
> but i think the AH policy comes off a bit abrasively. is that what
> you want? if so, thats ok--metasonix pulls offensive off in spades,
> but its almost a given that you'll be insulted by all of eric's
> product pages, because thats part of the charm. =)
>
> i think too that it would be good for plan b to specify the *minimum*
> guaranteed performance of a given module, only as tested--in order to
> prevent customer misunderstandings.
>
> just my two Cs,
> hans
>
> --- In PLAN_B_analog_blog@yahoogroups.com, "(i think you can figure
> that out)" <peter@...> wrote:
>>
>> Seems I've cased some waves with our new policies. Wasn't my
>> intention. If you don
>> t know about this, have a look at the Purchase page, click on the NO
>> ADAM HENDRY policy and give it a read. The information included is
>> vital, but the tongue and cheek in it's name went over like a lead
>> zepplin.
>>
>> It seems I have offended the very group of people I'm here to support,
>> some of the most talented individuals I've ever met, and I'm asking
>> for your assistance.
>>
>> I think you know the thrust behind it. It's something that had to
>> happen. I do no know of any manufacturer who clearly states what is to
>> be expected of the equipment they are about to purchase. I need to
>> make that clear. Help me rewrite it, please give me suggestions. All
>> will be considered.
>>
>> thanks,
>>
>> - P
>>
>
> 



-- 
Such A Handsome Piece Of Deformity