I'm not sure why you're so hostile to user feedback ("please by all means purchase the
other unit", Adam Henry). I'm just trying to point out that $175 for just a frame is is
significantly more expensive in most typical customer scenarios. It's not an attack on you
or your company.
If you could find a way to bring the price down closer to the $65 dotCom frame, you'd
probably have a hit. How come Roger can make it for less than half your price?
--- In PLAN_B_analog_blog@yahoogroups.com, "(i think you can figure that out)"
<peter@...> wrote:
>
> This isn't a valid argument and your prices are incorrect.
>
> With the Doepfer you get a wallwart powered PSU good for 1.2 amps and inadequate
crowbar protection. You'll need 3 of these to get the same current rating as a single Plan
B PSU so adding that together it's (approximately) 3 x $150 for the Ringers $175 for the
Plan PSU unit which comes in a self contained aluminum enclosure which requires no do-
it-yourselfing.
>
> So for the Plan B equivalent try $625, not $875 and with it you'll get an OEM built
Condor power supply with incredible parametric stats and crowbar protection that actually
works. You plug a module in backwards with a condor you're not going to have to return
it to the manufacturer for repair.
>
> The bottom line, Plan B is not in a price war with Doepfer. If the $250 or so Plan B will
make as profit on three Ringers and a PSU is unacceptable, then please by all means
purchase the other unit.
>
> - P
>
>
>
> --- In PLAN_B_analog_blog@yahoogroups.com, "laryn91" <caymus91@> wrote:
> >
> > Oops... my math was in error. It's even worse for the Ringer solution:
> >
> > $875 for the Ringer
> > $390 for the Doepfer
>Message
Re: Ringer
2009-02-16 by laryn91
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.