I like the idea of internal VCA's, makes the unit handy for other purposes. Rob On Tuesday, October 5, 2004, at 03:16 PM, Johan Boberg wrote: > > >VC Quad panner as a stand alone sounds like a great idea, > >actually. Let me give that some serious thought. Again, if > >enough people say 'yeah', it's a win win for everybody. > > Yeah! > > I suggest that it should have X and Y control and a general > VCA control to enable proportinal simultaneous attenuation > of X and Y. > > After this point i guess there is two ways to go: > Routing audio through this module or doing it as a quad pan > controller and using external vcas. > > An upside of separating control and audio is that you could experiment > with using different types of VCAs, for example it would be interesting > to try a buchla-style quad lowpass gate as VCAs. > > But an internal VCAs is of course more handy and easier to use. > And if it would have multiple channels with separate quad routing > it would do the mixing and go directly from there to speakers. > > A quad panner would probably be cheaper to build without the VCAs but > in the end it would be more expensive and require more patching. > On the other hand the VCAs could occationally be used for other > purpouses. Another upside of a control only module is that it could > be used to control other things than VCAs. > > What's the best way to go do you think? > > /Johan > > > > > > >Thanks for this (good) idea. > > > >- P > > > >--- In PLAN_B_analog_blog@yahoogroups.com, Robert > >Hoffman <robmix@e...> wrote: > > > Maybe there's two separate modules, the Balanced Stereo > >Output, which > > > I'm all for - sign me up, and a VC Quad panner. > > > > > > Rob > > > > > > > > > > > > On Monday, October 4, 2004, at 01:17 PM, Johan Boberg wrote: > > > > > > > About the proposed Balanced Stereo Output Processor, > > > > it looks really useful, i would really like to have one. > > > > > > > > But i would really love to have it somehow patchable as a > > > > Quad Output Processor if possible. It could still be used > > > > as a stereo out if this is preferred. I don't know exactly > > > > what it would take to convert your design into this without > > > > changing it too much though... > > > > > > > > /Johan > > > > > >~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > >~~~~~~~~~~ > > > > Johan Boberg > >http://www.eam.se > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <image.tiff> > > > > > > > > > > > <image.tiff> > > > > > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > > > > > • To visit your group on the web, go to: > > > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/PLAN_B_analog_blog/ > > > > > > > > • To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: > > > > PLAN_B_analog_blog-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com > > > > > > > > • Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms > >of Service. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > > > > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > Johan Boberg http://www.eam.se > > > <image.tiff> > > <image.tiff> > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > • To visit your group on the web, go to: > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/PLAN_B_analog_blog/ > > • To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: > PLAN_B_analog_blog-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com > > • Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service. >
Message
Re: [PLAN_B_analog_blog] Re: Quad Panner
2004-10-05 by Robert Hoffman
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.