PLAN B analog blog

At 00:16 2004-10-06, you wrote:


> >VC Quad panner as a stand alone sounds like a great idea,
> >actually.  Let me give that some serious thought.  Again, if
> >enough people say 'yeah', it's a win win for everybody.
>
>Yeah!
>
>I suggest that it should have X and Y control and a general
>VCA control to enable proportinal simultaneous attenuation
>of X and Y.

I see this may be interpreted in different ways, what i mean is:
VC X and Y and VC of proportinal simultaneous attenuation of the
four outputs, kind of VC Z (half of it, from here to nothingness).

( Actually when i think about it, the VC Z could have an invert switch,
that way you could patch the same X, Y, Z CV to two quad modules,
invert one of the Z inputs and have an 8 channel cube panner! )



>After this point i guess there is two ways to go:
>Routing audio through this module or doing it as a quad pan
>controller and using external vcas.
>
>An upside of separating control and audio is that you could experiment
>with using different types of VCAs, for example it would be interesting
>to try a buchla-style quad lowpass gate as VCAs.
>
>But an internal VCAs is of course more handy and easier to use.
>And if it would have multiple channels with separate quad routing
>it would do the mixing and go directly from there to speakers.
>
>A quad panner would probably be cheaper to build without the VCAs but
>in the end it would be more expensive and require more patching.
>On the other hand the VCAs could occationally be used for other
>purpouses. Another upside of a control only module is that it could
>be used to control other things than VCAs.
>
>What's the best way to go do you think?
>
>/Johan
>
>
>
>
>
> >Thanks for this (good) idea.
> >
> >- P
> >
> >--- In PLAN_B_analog_blog@yahoogroups.com, Robert
> >Hoffman <robmix@e...> wrote:
> > > Maybe there's two separate modules, the Balanced Stereo
> >Output, which
> > > I'm all for - sign me up, and a VC Quad panner.
> > >
> > > Rob
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Monday, October 4, 2004, at 01:17 PM, Johan Boberg wrote:
> > >
> > > > About the proposed Balanced Stereo Output Processor,
> > > > it looks really useful, i would really like to have one.
> > > >
> > > > But i would really love to have it somehow patchable as a
> > > > Quad Output Processor if possible. It could still be used
> > > > as a stereo out if this is preferred. I don't know exactly
> > > > what it would take to convert your design into this without
> > > > changing it too much though...
> > > >
> > > > /Johan
> > > >
> >~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> >~~~~~~~~~~
> > > > Johan Boberg
> >http://www.eam.se
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > <image.tiff>
> > > >
> > > >
> > > <image.tiff>
> > > >
> > > > Yahoo! Groups Links
> > > >
> > > > •   To visit your group on the web, go to:
> > > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/PLAN_B_analog_blog/
> > > >
> > > > •   To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> > > > PLAN_B_analog_blog-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
> > > >
> > > > •   Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms
> >of Service.
> > > >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>Johan Boberg                               http://www.eam.se
>
>
>
>
>
>
>Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Johan Boberg                               http://www.eam.se