Wow, thanks for the epic reply, Peter. After reading I've decided that I wouldn't want to change anything about the M13's sound just to get a shorter decay. Now, If I had a bunch of them then I might go tinkering for the sake of variety. --- In PLAN_B_analog_blog@yahoogroups.com, "(i think you can figure that out)" <peter@...> wrote: > > You can alter the decay - the ringing - of the Model 13. This is due to circuitry I have > added to cut the bleeding down. You can't do this with Doepfer LPGs, or Buchla 292's for > that matter, nor with the Wiard Borg which is very close to the Buchla 292 in design. > > Looking at the PCB, you'll first notice it's basically two duplicate circuits (one each for the > two TG's) with a slender line of circuitry in the middle (that's the crossfader section). > > On each of the TG halves, at the bottom (edge) of their real estate you'll see four pads in a > line that are ellipically shaped. In older M13s there are wires soldered to these pads which > go to the faceplate. Newer models have a parallel connection via a 12 (and now 14) pin in > line connector in the center of the board which lies right in front of the corssfader pot's > backside. Holding the PCB so that the power connector is on the upper right, to the left of > those four pads you'll see two others labelled J1. In older PCBS - those before rev. 2, there > a standup resistor soldered into J1. In Rev. 2 and above, another resistor was added > directly to the left of those two pads - a 470 K ohm resistor. Those resistors, either > configured as a standup in the J1 pads, or from the added resistor next to them are the > current limiters that determines how much of the bleed killer is mixed into the the circuit. > > J1 was configured as it was because it will allow for a two position jumper block to be > installed - like the little things that were on the back of SCSI disk drives to set their ID > number. Inserting a jumper there puts the bleed killer on maximum. removing the > jumper would remove it altogether. I stopped installing those jumper blocks early on > because of availability issues with the jumpers. I was not willing to slow delivery down to > to a G.D. part that for some reason (still surprised by that) - hard to get. THey were listed > in supplier site, but constantly sold out. > > The lower that resistance, the less bleed and slightly less ringing or response time to the > DECAY of the vactrol. In earlier models I was shipping with a zero ohm resistor in there - > putting the bleed killer on maximum, which also cut back the decay. Later I started > allowing less of that into the circuit, which slightly increased the bleeding, but made the > ring longer - that's the 470K resistor. > > If you want to cut back the amount of ringing, increase the value of those resistors. If you > want more, increase it or, to get the longest possible ring, remove those parts altogether. > Just cut them out. This will make the vacs rings at their maximum. Unfortunately, it also > effects the level of vac's inherent bleed. WIth no resistor in there, the bleed is about 3mv - > meaning when the gate is fully closed, about 3mv of signal is still allowed through the > device at it's outputs. On the other side of the possible variables - a zero ohm (a jumper > i.e. no resistance), there's only a third of a mv of bleed, but about half the ringing. > > Don't shoot me about the bleeding - it's not my fault! it's the vacs. Their technology does > not allow them to close to zero ohms. At best they will close down to only 80 ohms. WIth > the bleed killer set with a zero ohm resistor, the bleed is pretty much inaudible, unless > you're gating very very harmonically rich signals with pure silence in between events. With > the resistor removed (the bleeder then is taken out of the circuit). the bleeding is a lot > more prevalent. > > Another issue is no two vactrrols have the same amount of bleed. You will need to tune > each if you want them to ring the exact same amount. Again this is due to vactrerol > technology. If you look at the Perkin-Elmer spec sheet, you'll see a spec clled DARK > RESISTANCE AFTER TEN SECONDS. THe After seconds part was not thrown in there to fill a > line - it's there because PE felt that was a safe amount of time to assure the vactrol was > fully closed - meaning some of them will take almost as long. Again, part of their charm! > THe ringing get to be more of an issue with the Model 12 vacsa - we actually have to bin > them before hand to cut it back to the point I think that filtwer sounds best. THose which > don't make the mark are used in the M15 crossfader bacuaee bleed is less of an issue - it > actually makes for smoother crossfading. The M13 usesa a slightly different vactrol than > the ones used in the model 12, 15 and 24, but they still don't go down to zero ohms. No > vactrols do. > > In summary - you can play around with alternatives if you want less (or more) bleeding. A > zero ohm cuts the ringing (and bleeding) down to it's maximum. Removing the part > altogether is the other side of the scale - maximum ring and bleed. If you really hate the > ring there's a little more you can do - either replace the vac with another type - one which > is by design much faster -or- get a Deopfer LPG. He used an exteremely fast vac which > has little or no ringing. If you elect to change the vac in the M13 - make sure it's a dual > resistant element type. These are the ones that have three leads onthe resistor side, not > just two. > > I chose the vacs I did because I like the ringing as i feel it's part of the module's > personality. They are really dead sounding in comparison without it. > > Hope this helps, > > - P >
Message
Re: M13 Response Time - you can change it.
2007-01-25 by jeswa
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.