No kidding,
I would strongly suggest submitting that same images without a coating.. It's an incredible opportunity to evaluate the difference.. so please do it.. I have played with trying and to understand what a coating contributes to longitivity but I'm not a test facility.. but I've been messing with this for several years now.. I just expose pieces to raw sunlight thru the windows in my studio.. it's brutal.. Coatings make a huge difference but what I feel is different about them is that when they reach a point they just stop .. where as with say pigment inks the change is gradual.. not the case with coatings.. they need to be re-applied to continue their effect and when you do that they continue to work work and this part of it we've done it..
But all this stuff is a coating.. and it's build up on top of the art work.. right? We have so much yet to learn..
jimbo
----- Original Message -----
From: Paul Roark
To: QuadtoneRIP@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Friday, June 01, 2012 10:21 AM
Subject: Re: [QuadtoneRIP] Re: Carbon printing
> **
> ...
>
> I guess I could submit some test patterns without the spray... but it
> would take a while to reach 100 Megalux hours again!
>
I still might be worth it. We might see from even initial results what the
trends are.
Paul
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]Message
Re: [QuadtoneRIP] Re: Carbon printing
2012-06-01 by jimbo
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.