Bob I've been using the K7's on a 2200 for a month now and have been getting good results using QTR GrayLab as a working space. I'm on a PC, so when I'm ready to print I convert to QTR GrayMatt and save as a Tiff and then open in QTR gui. Select the paper curve, dither option and 2880 (leave the Ink Limit and Gamma at zero). Another option rather than converting to QTR GrayMatt is to leave your image in the QTR GrayLab space and set the Gamma to +4 or +5 then select paper curve, etc. Neither of these two work flows is perfect but either will give you a taste of the K7's capabilities. For what it's worth, I've tried using Gray Gamma 2.2 as a print space and not had good results. I realize GG2.2 is the recommended print space according to the instructions, but for what ever reason it just hasn't worked well for me. Will >Message: 3 > Date: Sun, 2 Oct 2005 14:04:30 -0400 > From: "Bob Hove" <robert@...> >Subject: gray gamma 2.2 or gray-lab.icc for 2200 > >Hi - I have an Epson 2200,have purchased the piezography NK7 inks for it and >am trying to learn how to get the best prints I can out of the combination. >My question is, which would be better to use for the ink set when preparing >my pictures with photoshop cs2 - gray gamma 2.2 or gray-lab.icc? > > > >This is my first post here (I've been lurking for a couple of months). > > > >Bob Hove > >Robert@... > >
Message
Re: gray gamma 2.2 or gray-lab.icc for 2200
2005-10-04 by Will
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.