Yahoo Groups archive

QTR-Quadtone RIP

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 23:12 UTC

Thread

gray gamma 2.2 or gray-lab.icc for 2200

gray gamma 2.2 or gray-lab.icc for 2200

2005-10-02 by Bob Hove

Hi - I have an Epson 2200,have purchased the piezography NK7 inks for it and
am trying to learn how to get the best prints I can out of the combination.
My question is, which would be better to use for the ink set when preparing
my pictures with photoshop cs2 - gray gamma 2.2 or gray-lab.icc?

 

This is my first post here (I've been lurking for a couple of months).  

 

Bob Hove

Robert@...

Re: gray gamma 2.2 or gray-lab.icc for 2200

2005-10-04 by Will

Bob

I've been using the K7's on a 2200 for a month now and have been getting 
good results using QTR GrayLab as a working space. I'm on a PC, so when 
I'm ready to print I convert to QTR GrayMatt and save as a Tiff and then 
open in QTR gui. Select the paper curve, dither option and 2880 (leave 
the Ink Limit and Gamma at zero). Another option rather than converting 
to QTR GrayMatt is to leave your image in the QTR GrayLab space and set 
the Gamma to +4 or +5 then select paper curve, etc.
Neither of these two work flows is perfect but either will give you a 
taste of the K7's capabilities.
For what it's worth, I've tried using Gray Gamma 2.2 as a print space 
and not had good results. I realize GG2.2 is the recommended print space 
according to the instructions, but for what ever reason it just hasn't 
worked well for me.

Will
Show quoted textHide quoted text
>Message: 3         
>   Date: Sun, 2 Oct 2005 14:04:30 -0400
>   From: "Bob Hove" <robert@...>
>Subject: gray gamma 2.2 or gray-lab.icc for 2200
>
>Hi - I have an Epson 2200,have purchased the piezography NK7 inks for it and
>am trying to learn how to get the best prints I can out of the combination.
>My question is, which would be better to use for the ink set when preparing
>my pictures with photoshop cs2 - gray gamma 2.2 or gray-lab.icc?
>
> 
>
>This is my first post here (I've been lurking for a couple of months).  
>
> 
>
>Bob Hove
>
>Robert@...
>  
>

RE: [QuadtoneRIP] Re: gray gamma 2.2 or gray-lab.icc for 2200

2005-10-04 by Bob Hove

Will - thanks - that helps a lot! I have found the instructions that come
with QTR confusing, so your description of your work flow was just what I
was looking for.  I have made several prints with the K7's that were very
impressive just converting to gray scale and saving as a tiff, but I'm
looking to improve the way I work.  

 

Thanks again!

 

Bob

  _____  
Show quoted textHide quoted text
From: QuadtoneRIP@yahoogroups.com [mailto:QuadtoneRIP@yahoogroups.com] On
Behalf Of Will
Sent: Monday, October 03, 2005 11:30 PM
To: QuadtoneRIP@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [QuadtoneRIP] Re: gray gamma 2.2 or gray-lab.icc for 2200

 

Bob

I've been using the K7's on a 2200 for a month now and have been getting 
good results using QTR GrayLab as a working space. I'm on a PC, so when 
I'm ready to print I convert to QTR GrayMatt and save as a Tiff and then 
open in QTR gui. Select the paper curve, dither option and 2880 (leave 
the Ink Limit and Gamma at zero). Another option rather than converting 
to QTR GrayMatt is to leave your image in the QTR GrayLab space and set 
the Gamma to +4 or +5 then select paper curve, etc.
Neither of these two work flows is perfect but either will give you a 
taste of the K7's capabilities.
For what it's worth, I've tried using Gray Gamma 2.2 as a print space 
and not had good results. I realize GG2.2 is the recommended print space 
according to the instructions, but for what ever reason it just hasn't 
worked well for me.

Will


>Message: 3         
>   Date: Sun, 2 Oct 2005 14:04:30 -0400
>   From: "Bob Hove" <robert@...>
>Subject: gray gamma 2.2 or gray-lab.icc for 2200
>
>Hi - I have an Epson 2200,have purchased the piezography NK7 inks for it
and
>am trying to learn how to get the best prints I can out of the combination.
>My question is, which would be better to use for the ink set when preparing
>my pictures with photoshop cs2 - gray gamma 2.2 or gray-lab.icc?
>
> 
>
>This is my first post here (I've been lurking for a couple of months).  
>
> 
>
>Bob Hove
>
>Robert@...
>  
>




SPONSORED LINKS 


Digital
<http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=Digital+wedding+photography&w1=Digital+
wedding+photography&w2=Learn+digital+photography&w3=Digital+photography+coll
ege&w4=Digital+photography&w5=Digital+photography+web+site&w6=Digital+photog
raphy+course&c=6&s=188&.sig=Umur-3rsLOic7dZMwVL94w>  wedding photography 

Learn
<http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=Learn+digital+photography&w1=Digital+we
dding+photography&w2=Learn+digital+photography&w3=Digital+photography+colleg
e&w4=Digital+photography&w5=Digital+photography+web+site&w6=Digital+photogra
phy+course&c=6&s=188&.sig=emApqtvj0kHQhppIzRrNgw>  digital photography 

Digital
<http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=Digital+photography+college&w1=Digital+
wedding+photography&w2=Learn+digital+photography&w3=Digital+photography+coll
ege&w4=Digital+photography&w5=Digital+photography+web+site&w6=Digital+photog
raphy+course&c=6&s=188&.sig=aIiABJLTZsUnmWBs4mZwuA>  photography college 


Digital
<http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=Digital+photography&w1=Digital+wedding+
photography&w2=Learn+digital+photography&w3=Digital+photography+college&w4=D
igital+photography&w5=Digital+photography+web+site&w6=Digital+photography+co
urse&c=6&s=188&.sig=pJmwqgVzec3JGBtWYlPbOg>  photography 

Digital
<http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=Digital+photography+web+site&w1=Digital
+wedding+photography&w2=Learn+digital+photography&w3=Digital+photography+col
lege&w4=Digital+photography&w5=Digital+photography+web+site&w6=Digital+photo
graphy+course&c=6&s=188&.sig=BMII8rtDZlAtVdZsPhaZqw>  photography web site 

Digital
<http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=Digital+photography+course&w1=Digital+w
edding+photography&w2=Learn+digital+photography&w3=Digital+photography+colle
ge&w4=Digital+photography&w5=Digital+photography+web+site&w6=Digital+photogr
aphy+course&c=6&s=188&.sig=OrnrutXVhHZu-7E7ccLtuw>  photography course 

 

  _____  

YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS 

 

*	 Visit your group "QuadtoneRIP
<http://groups.yahoo.com/group/QuadtoneRIP> " on the web.
  
*	 To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
 QuadtoneRIP-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
<mailto:QuadtoneRIP-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com?subject=Unsubscribe> 
  
*	 Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo!
<http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/>  Terms of Service. 

 

  _____

Re: gray gamma 2.2 or gray-lab.icc for 2200

2005-10-04 by Chris Hargens

Where are the instructions for using the NK7 inkset? Also -- if
possible -- could you tell us a bit about how the inkset compares to
what you were using before? I'm currently printing on a 2200 with QTR
and the UC inkset. Considering that Epson carts go for $8.90 from
Atlex while the NK7 carts go for $16.95, I'm hesitating.... I've seen
a few good, but fairly brief, reviews; still like to see more info.

Chris Hargens

 


 --- In QuadtoneRIP@yahoogroups.com, Will <will@p...> wrote:
> Bob
> 

> For what it's worth, I've tried using Gray Gamma 2.2 as a print space 
> and not had good results. I realize GG2.2 is the recommended print
space 
Show quoted textHide quoted text
> according to the instructions, but for what ever reason it just hasn't 
> worked well for me.
> 
> Will
>

RE: [QuadtoneRIP] Re: gray gamma 2.2 or gray-lab.icc for 2200

2005-10-04 by Tom Moore

I imagine printing with the NK7 ink with QTR is no different than any other
ink set.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: QuadtoneRIP@yahoogroups.com [mailto:QuadtoneRIP@yahoogroups.com] On
> Behalf Of Chris Hargens

...

> 
> Where are the instructions for using the NK7 inkset? Also -- if

...

Re: gray gamma 2.2 or gray-lab.icc for 2200

2005-10-05 by Will

Chris

The instructions come as a Quick Start Guide with the Neutral K7 inkset. 
Prior to using the K7's, I used QTR with the UC inkset through a 2200. 
The first thing I noticed with the K7's was the stark neutrality - 
beautiful and revealing with no distracting color cross overs. Images 
have a richness and depth that I just couldn't quite achieve with The 
Ultrachromes. The only complaint that I have is actually a backhanded 
compliment. The K7's show so much smoothness and detail that they're 
showing the flaws in my scanning that didn't seem so obvious before. As 
far as being able to shift the tonality, the K7's are a bit more limited 
here than using a color inkset, though the shift that does occur (by 
switching paper tones) looks more subtle and integral to the image - 
K7's have tonality radiate from the image vs. UC's have the image 
composed of tonality. Hard to describe.
I've got four prints on my walls that were printed last year by 
Custom-Digital <http://www.custom-digital.com> and I've been chasing 
their quality ever since. The Ultrachromes always looked a bit crude to 
me by comparison to these prints. The K7's look like they belong along 
side of them.

Will
Show quoted textHide quoted text
>
>Message: 13        
>   Date: Tue, 04 Oct 2005 14:29:56 -0000
>   From: "Chris Hargens" <tzinzunzan2000@...>
>Subject: Re: gray gamma 2.2 or gray-lab.icc for 2200
>
>Where are the instructions for using the NK7 inkset? Also -- if
>possible -- could you tell us a bit about how the inkset compares to
>what you were using before? I'm currently printing on a 2200 with QTR
>and the UC inkset. Considering that Epson carts go for $8.90 from
>Atlex while the NK7 carts go for $16.95, I'm hesitating.... I've seen
>a few good, but fairly brief, reviews; still like to see more info.
>
>Chris Hargens
>
> 
>
>
> --- In QuadtoneRIP@yahoogroups.com, Will <will@p...> wrote:
>  
>
>>Bob
>>
>>    
>>
>
>  
>
>>For what it's worth, I've tried using Gray Gamma 2.2 as a print space 
>>and not had good results. I realize GG2.2 is the recommended print
>>    
>>
>space 
>  
>
>>according to the instructions, but for what ever reason it just hasn't 
>>worked well for me.
>>
>>Will
>>
>  
>

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.