I've come tot he conclusion that one of the problems with getting non-neutral (or at least slightly unpleasant metamerism) despite using QTR is caused by the interaction of the inks and the optical brighteners in different lights. This is usually worst in any mix of tungsten and daylight. As such I've narrowed my choice of papers down to this without optical brighteners (or that seem to have minimal brighteners). Of course a side effect of this seems to be that the OBA's lose their effectiveness over time anyway and so many "bright white" papers become warmer anyway... Having no OBA's means you know from the start more how the warmth of the paper/print looks. As such, despite using Photo Rag extensively I've found the following papers work well: Arches Infinity (my current favourite - and of course, the most expensive possible choice...) Red River Dourian Art 2-Sided (next beast favourite) - seems to have a small amount of OBA's but it is very close to the Arches - great DMax, slightly cooler (and double sided which means you can re-use duff prints for testing) - a very nice paper Entrada Natural (not too bad - used to have big flaking issues, okay DMax, but not the worlds greatest and has a "flop" I just don't like...). Innova Soft Textured Art - not bad, a bit more texture than some Innova Cold Pressed Art - nice if it wasn't soooo textured (The Innova Photo Smooth Cotton is also pretty nice, despite the OBA's - however Innova does it isn't as objectionable as most) I'll interested to see what the new Crane Museo Max (or whatever it's called) performs along these lines (I never really liked Museo) I thought Hahnemuhle was going to make a non-OBA Photo Rag, which would be very attractive, but I don't remember it ever showing up yet (William Turner, which I don't think has OBA's, would be nice if it didn't flake if you blink at it). tim a
Message
RE: [QuadtoneRIP] Re: fine art matte photo paper
2005-10-09 by Timothy Atherton
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.