Charlie, It is interesting to read about your experience with k7 after Jon Cone's statements about how much more advanced are his curves. It is not the first careful negative response on k7 about DMax that I see. Is it about using k7 with QTR or in their environment? I am trying to understand how much of Cone's declarations is just a plain commercial bluff. After all he should be quite aggressive to sell his inks that are more than twice more expensive than MIS inks are. --Sergei --- In QuadtoneRIP@yahoogroups.com, "cvdunton" <cvdunton@v...> wrote: > > John, > I thought I knew at least a little something about monochrome > printing, but appearently not. At least not where the K7 inks are > concerned. Others have raved about them, but at this point, I'm a bit > disappointed. I'll grant you they are wonderfully smooth, and totally > dotless, at least to my eyes under 2x magnification, but for me, the > translation from monitor to paper appears really flat. The Dmax looks > disappointly low but I don't have a densitometer, so it's all > emperical at this point. > > BUT, others have written glowing reports. And that's what led me to > this group. I'm hoping that I can figure out what is causing me to get > results that I'm getting. > > At the moment, I'm getting much better results using the latest > version of QTR with my R2400 and the K3 inks. > > Charlie
Message
Re: new curves for RIP (correction)
2005-10-19 by santonov2you
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.