Oops, I meant "I have yet..." On Apr 22, 2016, 17:07, at 17:07, Larry <pianoquartet@...> wrote: >I have get to find an image of mine that looks good on Aurora Art >Natural. Of course, I got this paper before I knew what dmax is. > >Larry > > > >On Apr 22, 2016, 10:48, at 10:48, "Paul Roark roark.paul@... >[QuadtoneRIP]" <QuadtoneRIP@yahoogroups.com> wrote: >>Red River Aurora Natural is a very good and high per/$ value paper for >>many >>types of images. >> >>Paul >>www.PaulRoark.com >> >>On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 10:40 AM, rdeloe1@... [QuadtoneRIP] < >>QuadtoneRIP@yahoogroups.com> wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> Thanks Paul. Sound advice. Using the ICC helps a bit, but I don't >>like the >>> idea of having to make drastic adjustments to the image just for one >>paper. >>> >>> In the end I found a simpler solution: I returned as much of it as >I >>> could and learned my lesson. I should have paid attention to the >>reports of >>> low dMax! It's a shame because the weight and feel of the paper is >>very >>> nice. I presume it's working well for someone, because they've sold >>it for >>> a long time. It's just not a good choice for a carbon ink setup. >>> >>>
Message
Re: [QuadtoneRIP] Red River Aurora Art Natural salvage operation
2016-04-23 by Larry
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.