Long story short, no. The MK ink is actually too opaque in comparison to the LK ink meaning as the MK and LK ink start to merge in the HLs, you will get lots of white dots in the highlights of your darkroom print. The MK ink (Ultra-chrome HD) also rubs off of film easily and is very fragile as it is designed for more porous substrate. It doesn’t work well on film with no half-tone applied. best, Walker > On Jun 22, 2017, at 11:39 AM, TerryGls@... [QuadtoneRIP] <QuadtoneRIP@yahoogroups.com> wrote: > > I wish to "dedicate" my new P800 printer to Matte papers, however I also print dig negs on Pictorico film. > > My experience with my R1800 printer and Eboni MK ink and dig negs is the "grain" and smoothness is fine. However, the R1800 is a 1.5 picoliter drop size versus the P800 3.5 picoliter drop size. > > So my Question: > Would MK Epson ink on the P800 (P600) give as good results as PK ink dig negatives for Cyanotype, VDB, and Pl/Pt Alt processes? > > Thanks and any thoughts appreciated. > ~Terry > >
Message
Re: [QuadtoneRIP] P800 or P600 Digital Negatives - MK or PK Epson Ink
2017-06-22 by forums@walkerblackwell.com
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.