Yahoo Groups archive

QTR-Quadtone RIP

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 23:12 UTC

Message

Re: [QuadtoneRIP] scanner recommendations

2017-07-07 by Jacques Caron

Hi Art

Actually, resolution is one aspect of scanning; usually you must take in account the DMax offered by the scanner. I can't help you with medium format film since I use two "flatbed" scanners (not the best choice for films and negatives).

I use a Nikon Super Coolscan 5000ED for 35mm and at 4000 dpi and a DMax of 4.0, the results are great. Since I have more than 100,000 slides, and almost the same amount of B&W negs, a good scanner is the only way to go. The output files (Nikon, at 16-bits, are around 140 Mb). The good thing was that the Nikon driver (free) did a wonderful job (if you stayed away from the "Ice" use); the bad thing is that Nikon stopped the upgrading of the driver and, if you're with a newer system, it is not possible to use the driver.

For that, I bought a VueScan license and, believe it or not, at the price they ask, it's a bargain. My "old" scanner is working perfectly with my newer system (although I kind of lost the RAW attributes ; I must say that VueScan is offering a way of using it but my laziness kept me on the "tiff" side). Moreover, the license "sees" my two other scanners perfectly; so although a bit slower, I can use my "new" Epson V850 Pro and my "old" Microtek Scanmaker i800 (Both with a DMax 0f 4.0).

If you can find a "used" CoolScan (saw one at 400$ US on eBay), it could do the job with all your 35mm tasks.

One word about Silverfast; the license is "hooked" to one product. My V850 came with a "free" license for that scanner and, after trying different settings, I was not impress. The price is quite steep and, for me, overpriced. Sure they are "pro" profiles; that must do a good job but, as a matter of fact, the Epson driver delivered perfectly defined scans out of flat documents. As for "negatives" and "slides", some jagged edges are proprietary of a flatbed scanners. Although I wrote to Epson, the "support" is not so great. You'll have to call to see if they can help you. For me, I never called back, the answers were a bit obscure.

So, at the end. I would say that a resolution of 4000 dpi, with a DMax of at least 4.0 (the more the better- maybe the multi-scanning of Silverfast helps) could do the job. For an example, the Imacon scanner, (rotary one) has a 4.6 Dmax. It is surely out of your ballpark for the price, but, since these seem the best scanners out there you can see that a medium format resolution is around 3200 dpi. Must be the DMax!


Jacques Caron

On Jul 7, 2017, at 9:55 AM, 'Arthur Romano' aromanocpa@optonline.net [QuadtoneRIP] <QuadtoneRIP@yahoogroups.com> wrote:






I have a lot of 35 mm and medium format film to scan and wondering if anyone can make a recommendation. I am a fine art photographer that will be displaying prints from 8x10 to 16x20 . I am not interested so much in speed of the scan but highest resolution for printing. Also do you think the scan will come close to enlarging with a schnieder lens?
;
Getting tired of dealing with the chemicals I just picked up an EPSON P600 to get some archival quality to get me started.
Art



Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.