The proof of the validity of Richard's products are provided by the individuals testing and endorsing his digital negative software. Of those individuals, the most significant is Sandy King. A internationally recognized alternative process printer, esteemed beta tester of various software used to create digital negatives, recognized authoritative workshop instructor and noted author.
So there isn't any need for Richard to provide test or beta software since it is a proven product. So in short you are way off base with your implication of it being to good to be true.
Cordially,
Don Bryant