I’m in no way knocking Richard or his software. However, he indicated an intent to possibly release a trial version so I asked. I’m sure it’s wonderful software and he has every right to not release a trial version. I might buy it after trying to see if it’s worth it for me to improve my workflow, but I won’t shell out the money for something I haven’t tried. I’ve purchased many good products that haven’t really worked for me. So if there’s a trial version, there’s a good chance I’d buy it. If not, chances are I won’t. This says nothing about Richard and his software. This says that I don’t absolutely need it and won’t take the risk without a test drive. Sent from my iPhone > On Aug 29, 2018, at 9:49 PM, donsbryant@... [QuadtoneRIP] <QuadtoneRIP@yahoogroups.com> wrote: > > Mick, > > > The proof of the validity of Richard's products are provided by the individuals testing and endorsing his digital negative software. Of those individuals, the most significant is Sandy King. A internationally recognized alternative process printer, esteemed beta tester of various software used to create digital negatives, recognized authoritative workshop instructor and noted author. > > So there isn't any need for Richard to provide test or beta software since it is a proven product. So in short you are way off base with your implication of it being to good to be true. > > Cordially, > > Don Bryant > >
Message
Re: [QuadtoneRIP] Using QTR and Epson k3 Inks for making digital negs on OHP
2018-08-30 by David Aimone
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.