Daniel, I agree. GLOP helps a lot with UC but doesn't eliminate it. I would try UT7 again, but had a bad experience the first time in my 2200. For some reason ink would bubble up through the vent hole above the sponge area and it was so bad that ink would pool on top of the cartridge and then run down the side of the cart and into the printer. This is probably an issue with the cartridges and not UT7 itself but until I can be assured that I'm not going to get pooling ink again, I'm not going back to UT7 and MIS carts. To bad, because I like the ink set. The GLOP isn't so bad because I can just put an empty in its place and not have to worry about bubbling over. Paul > > The latest UT7 inkset also has very little gloss differential, but I still > like to use glop to take care of the highlights. There are some images > where you can see a really big difference. > > > Daniel Staver uploaded to the group files section some profiles that use > > MIS-PRO inks and GLOP in the yellow position. I believe his profiles > lay > > down the GLOP at the same time as when you are printing with QTR so > there > > is no second pass through the printer. You could use these profiles as > > inspiration to get started creating your own for the 4000. > > I also have curves for the UT7 inkset with GLOP and Epson Premium > Semigloss here: > http://daniel.staver.no/home/files -- This e-mail was scanned before sending. No virus was found in the outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.0.405 / Virus Database: 268.11.3/423 - Release Date: 8/18/2006
Message
RE: [QuadtoneRIP] Re: Hahnemuhle FAP, Profile for Epson 4000
2006-08-21 by Paul Yesnosky
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.