>is there a meaningful workflow for using the Piezotone inks with > Quadtone RIP? I have used the 3000 with the Cone plugin; with Cone's PiezographyBW ICC which I believe is similar to iQuad just not tailored to one's individual printer; and with QTR. I get far and away the best results with the old plugin...ICC and QTR have loss of detail and posterization in the high highlites, and obvious dithering in midtones. (This is looking closely with a critical eye...a civilian would probably have a hard time seeing it with 2 prints side by side.) I happily made many prints over a few months with QTR until one day I when starting to feel uneasy about highlight detail and made a comparison print with an 1160 using plugin. Ouch. At first I thought I'd have to ditch the 3000 but then made a print of the same image on the 3000 using the plugin...it was equal to that from the 1160. I know this isn't what you want to hear. I think the problem is that ICC and QTR use the Epson driver, and the mono-sized dots of the 3000 give a dithering pattern that's just too coarse. I think the plugin functions as a RIP. The good news is that the plugin works extremely well and isn't too expensive. Still available as R9 I believe. --John Wilton
Message
Re: Newbie: Piezotone, 3000 and QTR
2006-12-04 by ragarecords
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.