what's the other 10% at this point? They now also own the company that owns Colorvision. Talk about a monopoly. Color management is one area that a lot more competition might benifit. When was the last time you easily accessed useful consumer comparisons between the various profiling products, and the quality of their profiles? Tyler --- In QuadtoneRIP@yahoogroups.com, Alan Kearney <alan_kearney@...> wrote: > > I'm in the market for a printer profiler too and just home from > MacWorld in San Francisco where I talked with Epson for an hour. They > liked the Pulse, and thought it was a very solid, well designed and > useful tool. That said, X-Rite buying GretagMacbeth gives X-Rite > about 90% of the market share in the profiling department (according > to this Epson tech) and they decided to scrap the Pulse and go with > the Eye-One system, which can cost more money depending on > configuration. Funny thing was neither product was there at MacWorld :( > > Alan > > On Jan 10, 2007, at 1:50 PM, George Butch wrote: > > > The notion of creating my own curves for QTR is new for me. But I > > want to give it a shot. At the same time, I feel I have reached the > > limit of the capabilities of scanner based Monaco EZ Color for general > > color print profile generation. > > > > It appears that the newly merged X-Rite with GretagMacbeth has taken > > the Pulse package off the market. All of the current offerings are > > much more expensive. > > > > I have found a couple dealers who still stock the Pulse at a > > reasonable price. I am looking for some guidance here. Should I buy > > this apparently discontinued product, and is it really the best > > moderately priced tool for my two stated purposes? > > > > Thank You. > > > > George Butch > > Plantation, FL > > > > > > >
Message
Re: X-Rite Pulse
2007-01-11 by Tyler Boley
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.