--- In QuadtoneRIP@yahoogroups.com, "Tom Moore" <r.t.moore@...> wrote: > [...] converting an > image to the QTR-RGB-LAB space is not enough. You also need to use Photoshop > soft proof, using the profile QTR - RGB LAB space as the Device to Simulate, > selecting Relative Colorimetric, Black Point Compensation and Simulate Black > Ink (using PSCS2 terminology). > > Once you set up and select the soft proof you will see the image flatten > quite a bit - I expect a lot closer to your print, although it likely still > won't be perfect. Tom, I must confess I'm a bit confused. I tried soft-proofing earlier with no noticable advantage, so I left it aside. Based on your statements I tried it again, but like Frans, I don't see any difference whatsoever on my monitor with or without softproofing. I also would have difficulty to understand why I would see a difference, since if the system is well profiled anything should be linear. The typical use of softproofing as I know it, e.g. checking out-of-gamut colours, is not applicable in B&W printing. > That is because, although you are now using the right > technique, the profiles you are using are generic. If you have a measuring > device, you can use QTR-Create-ICC to create custom ICC profiles for > specific ink/paper combinations. These can give very close monitor print > registration, assuming the rest of your system is calibrated. I CAN understand that this step allows you to softproof the effect of paper color and ink tone. But once again, if the monitor is well calibrated and if the QTR curves are well linearized, I fail to understand how the icc profile qreate by QTR-Create-ICC can be anything else then a linear profile. What do I miss?? Joost
Message
Re: Why are Epson 2200 prints too dark
2007-02-27 by Joost Horsten
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.