Bert, I have not tried this, so I can't vouch for this, but I saved it from a previous post on this board. Hope it helps: Either there are very few 3800 out there or no one uses B&W any more... Well, since there seems to be no curves or profiles for the new 3800, I modified the install. 4800 command that installs the UC profiles for the 4800. Easy change, just copy the command and rename it to xxxx3800 instead of xxxx4800, run it and voila! The profiles are there. I've tested Hahnemuhle and Epson papers, and it works like a true charm!. The output stands a test against both an R800 and R1800 with Piezo NK7 inks!!! The added bonus are the sepia/warm/cool settings that indeed work. Of course, when you print 17x22, the printer reallly compares against chemical lambda prints from BWC!!! Actually they kind of hold more detail. The feature to mix profiles/curves for different aspect is indeed cool. I am looking forward to professionally produced curves/profiles, but definitely the 3800 is the way to go. It outperforms the 4800/9800 by a comfortable margin, quality-wise. --- In QuadtoneRIP@yahoogroups.com, "brtjaspers" <bert.jaspers@...> wrote: > > > Since there are no profiles (curves) for the 3800k3 is there a > possibility to use the 4800 k3 or the 2400 K3 profiles? > And if yes, how is this done. > > Bert >
Message
Re: Usability of 4800 or 2400 profiles for the 3800
2007-02-27 by zonepeter
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.