Michael, Some months ago, I did a side by side test with my 2100 on photorag because I wanted to make a final choice between the two inksets: I printed a BW pictures with a wide tonal range: 1. UT7 + Epson driver 2. UC + Eboni black + QTR RIP My conclusion: remarkable how difficult to see any difference in tonal range, shadows etc. Both dotless. And if there was a small difference, I was always able to correct it with some adjustment of levels/curves etc. So I choose for UC + Eboni because I had value for the color option. Regards, R.Bakker http://home.wanadoo.nl/rene.r.bakker/ --- In QuadtoneRIP@yahoogroups.com, "michaelrosensf" <michael@m...> wrote: > I'm in the process of upgrading from my 1160s and piezography to a 2200 and QTR. I've > made several prints with the 2200, QTR and the UC inks delivered with the machine (I did > replace the Photo black with Epson Matte black.) and need to think about buying more ink. > > For grayscale printing, with warmish toned inks on matte paper, would I see better results > with Epson UC inks or the MIS UT7 inks? For me "better" means smooth tonal transitions, > with deeper blacks and dot-less highlights secondary concerns, but I welcome other > definitions. > > (Ignore that the UC inks allow printing color.) > > Michael
Message
Re: 2200: UC or UT7?
2005-06-06 by René Bakker
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.