The short answer is yes. That is only based on the control factor. Olive Garden can make a dish just as Epson can make a print, but where is the KraftWerk? gar -----Original Message----- From: QuadtoneRIP@yahoogroups.com [mailto:QuadtoneRIP@yahoogroups.com]On Behalf Of David Keenan Sent: Saturday, June 02, 2007 8:18 AM To: QuadtoneRIP@yahoogroups.com Subject: [QuadtoneRIP] Re: why use QTR? I certainly wonder this too... I have made many prints on an Epson R2400 using ABW mode and now that I have a 3800, I continue to rely on ABW. With my new 3800, I profiled all my papers using the "extended gray" feature of the latest version of PrintFix Pro and did some print comparisons. The ABW prints were better in my (and other) opinions. The shadows were cleaner for sure. I haven't used my copy of QTR since my 2200 died and I replaced it with a R2400. Still for some reason I feel inadequate even though I am quite happy with the prints I make especially on Innova F-type paper... So, back on topic -- why do other printers find using ICC profiles, dedicated inksets, and/or QTR valuable? Are their prints that much better then what the Epson driver can do in ABW to make all the extra work (hassle, in my opinion) worth it? Or do this printers have an inherent "tinkerers mentality" (that I clearly lack) that makes this fun for them and that's why they choose the extra effort? Bottomline -- does this effort show up in the prints? Dave. -- Portfolio: www.david-keenan.com/portfolio Web Site: www.david-keenan.com 2007 PAW: www.david-keenan.com/paw [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] Yahoo! Groups Links
Message
RE: [QuadtoneRIP] Re: why use QTR?
2007-06-07 by Gary W. Weaver
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.