QTR-Quadtone RIP

Ok, I'm going out on a limb until more knowledge folks recover
from Independence Day :-)  But have you tried different QTR
"Resolution" and "Speed" settings on some smaller prints (just tests,
after all) and seen if the banding is happening uniformly?

Scott

SteveZ wrote:

>Yes, Scott, using Paul Roark's workflow/curves there is no banding 
>that I can see. That's what's confusing me.
>
>--- In QuadtoneRIP@yahoogroups.com, Scott McLoughlin <scott@a...> 
>wrote:
>  
>
>>I'm not a UT7 inkset user, but (1) are you getting good nozzle
>>checks? (2) can you print a successful image without QTR?
>>
>>
>>SteveZ wrote:
>>
>>    
>>
>>>I would also like to add that the prints made using QTR/Ut7 
>>>      
>>>
>Curves 
>  
>
>>>turn out much richer and overall much better (except for the 
>>>      
>>>
>banding) 
>  
>
>>>than using the Epson driver, which is really frustrating for me.
>>>
>>>
>>>--- In QuadtoneRIP@yahoogroups.com, "SteveZ" <blizzie12@y...> 
>>>      
>>>
>wrote:
>  
>
>>> 
>>>
>>>      
>>>
>>>>QTR experts I need your help.
>>>>
>>>>Today I just started using UT7 inks with QTR and I'm baffled by 
>>>>        
>>>>
>the 
>  
>
>>>>vertical and horizontal banding I'm experiencing with the 2200 
>>>>        
>>>>
>on 
>  
>
>>>>EEM.  Now....when I use Paul Roark's worflow/curves with the 
>>>>        
>>>>
>Epson 
>  
>
>>>>Driver the banding disappears and the prints turn out great.
>>>>
>>>>Weird huh?
>>>>
>>>>Is this a QTR problem? A 2200 problem? An inkset problem?
>>>>I believe I'm using the correct UT7 Curves for QTR as generously 
>>>>provided to me by Daniel Staver but I wouldn't think that would 
>>>>        
>>>>
>be a 
>  
>
>>>>factor.
>>>>
>>>>Any suggestions?
>>>>   
>>>>
>>>>        
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>Yahoo! Groups Links
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> 
>>>
>>>      
>>>
>
>
>
>
> 
>Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
> 
>
>  
>