Yahoo Groups archive

QTR-Quadtone RIP

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 23:12 UTC

Message

Re: [QuadtoneRIP] I still need advice

2007-08-10 by ifotogu@aol.com

Tony,

I think you will find photographers who prefer Quadtone and others who prefer ImagePrint. It is a matter a of personal taste -- in the same way as paper choices or even chemical preferences in an old wet darkroom. There is no right answer -- except the one you decide is right for you.



Given that you already have ImagePrint, I would download the Quadtone and take it for a spin. It is a shareware so you do not have to pay anything up front to try it out. If you like it, you can send in a check.



One advantage to the Quadtone is cost. But seeing as how you already have ImagePrint, you'll be in a position of comparing the two print-by-print without worrying about making a choice based on cost.



Good luck.



Robert



www.RobertDodge.com


-----Original Message-----
From: tonyonmarian <tony@...>
To: QuadtoneRIP@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Fri, 10 Aug 2007 10:35 am
Subject: [QuadtoneRIP] I still need advice







I seriously want to buy this Rip but need some input first. I posted
the following 10 days ago and have had zero responses. Did my post
break some rule?

"I know that this august body may be slightly biased, but I would like
some input.

I currently own an Epson 3800 and have Imageprint as my RIP. I have a
friend that swears by the B&W quality of his Quadtone RIP. My question
then is what are the pros and cons of each. I would consider a second
purchase of this type of app since 50% of my output is in B&W, but I
also worry whether they could play nicely together on my Mac.

Tony"



 

________________________________________________________________________
AOL now offers free email to everyone.  Find out more about what's free from AOL at AOL.com.


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.