QTR-Quadtone RIP

Thanks for your response. I reinstalled the program, after finding your
uninstall program. I did change the configuration of the paper size,
which is 5.5 x 8.5 to indicate the width as 5.5 and "length" as 8.5. The
prevue now is correct although it seems to me the terminology is
reversed. However, after the reinstallation I can't select a curve. I
get a message the "list index out of bounds". Since I can't select a
curve the program doesn't allow me to print!

I did select 1440 resolution, BTW. Again, thanks for your help.--- In
QuadtoneRIP@yahoogroups.com, "Stephen Billard" <stephen@...> wrote:
>
> You are probably suffering some sort of Windows spooler problem with
the
> printer. What resolution have you selected? (hint: all the supplied
curves
> are for 1440.)
>
> As to the portrait vs landscape modes: If you are using standard paper
> selectons things should look logical. If you have a custom size then
you
> need to understand that the display is oriented such that the "width"
edge
> is in the direction of the paper feed. If you always make your height
larger
> than your width things should look right, but (for instance with roll
paper)
> the feed direction might be a problem.
>
>
> - Stephen
> stephen.sbillard.org
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: QuadtoneRIP@yahoogroups.com [mailto:QuadtoneRIP@yahoogroups.com]
On
> Behalf Of arnnad
> Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2007 4:01 PM
> To: QuadtoneRIP@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [QuadtoneRIP] printing problem
>
> Hi. I am having a problem printing and did try downloading the latest
> software version without benefit. I have Windows XP, Adobe CS3 and the
Epson
> 2200.
>
> The image only prints part way, the printer then stops and I have to
remove
> the partial print manually. Also, the printed image is in portrait
> configuation. More puzzling, in order to get the preview image in the
> desired landscape mode I have to check "portrait", i.e. it's reversed.
I
> also checked autoconfigure, under options.
>
> I do hope you have a solution since I would love to give the software
an
> adequate trial.
>
> Thanks, Arnold Frank
>