--- In QuadtoneRIP@yahoogroups.com, sloopjohne@... wrote: ... > > Can you at least give us a sysnopsis of what was said? > > Thanks per Jon's permission... Who would have known that something like this could happen in America? Unfortunately after reviewing nearly 500 pages of the court ruling as well as the ITC ruling, it is clear that this affects every company in the USA that imports either empty, filled, or CIS cartridges for desktop printers. It does not affect large format. EPSON set up this website to bring it to the attention of all cartridge resellers: http://itc.epson.com/ This ruling only affects the USA and is now dependent upon the President of the USA, George W Bush, signing it into law - which is expected. It affects all desktop cartridges which have a chip parallel to the front of the cartridge but not the chip itself, the port through which ink feeds into the ink stem of the printer, and the device which holds the cartridge into the printer, also cartridges with foam or a bladder/valve. In short it covers all 750 models of EPSON products but only for the desktop. And yes CIS are affected. The end result being none of these cartridges will be allowed into the USA after the President signs it into law. It does give one pause to think that patent law has become more important in the USA than anti-trust law, and this may signal the beginning of entities rushing patents not in order to make innovation but rather to produce monopolies. It is a totally anti-competitive action which has occurred and is unfortunately a symptom of what is happening in the USA that affects people across all party lines. In short it affects every average US citizen, whether they are a photographer using monochromatic inks to replace the darkroom materials which are no longer manufactured, a scrap-booker trying to save money on their hobby, or the retiree that prints coffee mugs and mouse pads with dye-sublimation inks to augment their social security. Can you or anyone do anything? The International Trade Commission was charged with the below burden but may not have been presented with any evidence as to how it affected the USA because only a single surviving Chinese company was represented: ------- "If the Commission contemplates some form of remedy, it must consider the effects of that remedy upon the public interest. The factors the Commission will consider include the effect that an exclusion order and/or cease and desist orders would have on (1) the public health and welfare, (2) competitive conditions in the U.S. economy, (3) U.S. production of articles that are like or directly competitive with those that are subject to investigation, and (4) U.S. consumers. If the Commission orders some form of remedy, the President has 60 days to approve or disapprove the Commission's action." ------- So, if you think that the your welfare is affected by the ITC decision or that competitive conditions will be affected, etc, you should quickly write the President of the United States and reference this on both your envelope and the letterhead: RE: International Trade Commission 337 Investigation No. 337-TA-565 Please write the President. You have only a short time to act. start it thus: ------------ President George W. Bush The White House 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW Washington, DC 20500 [enter date here] RE: International Trade Commission 337 Investigation No. 337-TA-565 Dear Mr. President, I am writing to you concerning the October 19, 2007 decision by the International Trade Commission concerning the Section 337 Investigation in the Matter of Certain Ink Cartridges and Components Thereof (Inv. No.337-TA-565). Their decision is now coming to you for your approval, of which I hope you pause to reflect upon, and do not sign. The ITC decision adversely affects me because...[ this is where you write the because and you should speak of how it directly affects you or your business.] ...and dont forget to sign it! ------------ If you know someone high up on the media chain - make a phone call to them. Its a very newsworthy story that is being kept very quiet right now, probably so as not to upset what is seen as the inevitable signing into law of this historic ruling on consumables. Anti-trust law used to prevent this from happening. I can only imagine what other foreign and usa corporations will also attempt to monopolize a piece of the American economy. OPTIONS: 1) We recommend for our desktop users to look online for a supplier of CIS systems so they can be prepared to switch to bottles. 2) InkjetMall will be contacting its customers with a special offer to encourage them to upgrade to large format systems which are not affected by this ruling. 3) Save your current carts and learn how to take a syringe, draw a vacuum and refill from a bottle. A chip resetter available on the internet will refresh the ink memory chip. It may be necessary to temporarily tape over the ink outlet port in order to draw a sufficient vacuum. Of course, our European customers will be able to continue purchasing our desktop cartridges from our European resellers, but our European resellers will not be allowed to sell them to USA customers according to this ruling so this is not an option for USA customers. We can continue to purchase and fill inks for desktop in our overseas location for our European customers. best regards, Jon Cone
Message
Re: please read
2007-11-01 by Tyler Boley
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.