This looks interesting. But all I could find was a conversion applied to the original background as opposed to an adjustment layer which would be accessible for change. Creating a duplicate of the background layer and applying the conversion only there, etc., etc., would keep the original intact. Did I miss something? BTW, Justin Seely explains Calculations quite nicely. See, http://www.howcast.com/users/jseeley and look for Photoshop Quicktips Episode 55: Calculating a Grayscale. Harry On 3/3/08 2:14 PM, "Harry Lockwood" <hflockwood@...> wrote: > > No, but I¹m on my way there right now. Thanks. > > Harry > > On 3/3/08 1:04 PM, "John Vitollo" <jvlist@... > <mailto:jvlist%40comcast.net> > wrote: >> > >> > --- In QuadtoneRIP@yahoogroups.com <mailto:QuadtoneRIP%40yahoogroups.com> >> <mailto:QuadtoneRIP%40yahoogroups.com> , >> > Harry Lockwood <hflockwood@...> wrote: >>>> >> > >>>> >> > I was never very happy with Channel Mixer. I¹m now exploring >>>> Calculations >>>> >> > in PS/CS3 for that purpose. You might have look there too. >> > >> > Have you tried the new B+W adjustment layer in Photoshop CS3? >> > >> > Better than Calculations or Channel Mixer IMHO... >> > >> > -- Harry F. Lockwood [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Message
Re: [QuadtoneRIP] Re: Channel Mixer and Profiles???
2008-03-03 by Harry Lockwood
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.