Hi Howard, yesterday night i used all your advices and finally i create a curve that prints a 21step.psd without a step (may be just a little step but nothing compere to the other curve). happy of the result i printed a foto and i realized that was darker then what i was seeing on my monitor. I modifyed gamma from 1 to 1,5 but the result was that the picture was lighter but the step appeared again !!! The curve that works well but print darker is here : N_OF_INKS=6 DEFAULT_INK_LIMIT=30 BOOST_K=30 LIMIT_K=30 LIMIT_C=15 LIMIT_M=15 LIMIT_Y=13,33 LIMIT_LC=13,33 LIMIT_LM=13,33 N_OF_GRAY_PARTS=3 GRAY_INK_1=K GRAY_VAL_1=100 GRAY_INK_2=C GRAY_VAL_2=33,33 GRAY_INK_3=LC GRAY_VAL_3=16,66 GRAY_HIGHLIGHT=10 GRAY_SHADOW=6 GRAY_OVERLAP=20 GRAY_GAMMA=1 GRAY_CURVE= N_OF_TONER_PARTS=0 TONER_HIGHLIGHT=10 TONER_SHADOW=10 TONER_GAMMA=1 TONER_CURVE= N_OF_TONER_2_PARTS=0 TONER_2_HIGHLIGHT=10 TONER_2_SHADOW=10 TONER_2_GAMMA=1 TONER_2_CURVE= N_OF_UNUSED=0 COPY_CURVE_M=C COPY_CURVE_Y=LC COPY_CURVE_LM=LC do you think i have to preprocess the photos with a brigthness layer on photoshop ? or may be i am a problem with settings of my monitor (lcd samsung) ? --- In QuadtoneRIP@yahoogroups.com, Howard Shaw <glassman@...> wrote: > > Hi Paolo > > > on K for limit 30 i have L=24 > > on C and M for limit 90 i have L=35 ---> on K i have L=35 for limit 15 > > on Y,LC,LM for limit 90 i have L=45 ---> on K i have L=45 for limit 10 > > > > so i created a curve with > > C limit 45 (half of 90) and denisty = 15/30*100 = 50 > > M copy corve from C > > LC limit 30 (90/3) and denisty = 10/30*100 = 33 > > Y copy corve from LC > > LM copy corve from LC > > I'm not sure if I follow that although the end result might be okay! > It's not clear from what you have written but you should compare the > 100% patch for C printed at your chosen limit (90) with the equivalent K > value on the reprinted ink separation page with the ink calibration bar > set at 30 (your chosen limit for K). > > Then calculate as follows: > The 100% patch for C on the limit 90 print measures L=35 which is > equivalent to the 50% K patch on the limit 30 print > Therefore first partition = 50 > The 100% patch for LC on the limit 90 print measures L=45 = 33% K > 'patch' (ie somewhere between the 30% & 35% patches) on the 30% limit print > Therefore second partition = 33 > > You are correct with your sub-division of the duplicated inks. > > As a general comment, the limits and densities for the non-K inks seem > high to me particularly for 2880dpi but I don't have an R260 so can't > judge. Are you sure you are getting clearly visible separation between > patches at 90%? If not, you should reduce the limits to a point where > you are getting good separation. > > You are at a disadvantage using a scanner as opposed to a densitometer > or similar. For example the Dmax for eboni on EAM should be in the > region of 16-17, not 24. > > > why you choose : > > GRAY_HIGHLIGHT=4 > > GRAY_SHADOW=8 > > GRAY_OVERLAP=16 > > GRAY_GAMMA=1 > > These are the defaults - no need to change them unless there is a > particular issue. > > > a last question : have i to print with 1440 dpi on EAM ? > > No, 2880dpi is fine as long as the inks are limited correctly. > > regards > Howard > > paolovertullo wrote: > > Hi Howard > > just to see if i have understood well > > > > I scanned the ink_limit_pattern and misured the L value with photoshop > > and found that > > > > on K for limit 30 i have L=24 > > on C and M for limit 90 i have L=35 ---> on K i have L=35 for limit 15 > > on Y,LC,LM for limit 90 i have L=45 ---> on K i have L=45 for limit 10 > > > > so i created a curve with > > C limit 45 (half of 90) and denisty = 15/30*100 = 50 > > M copy corve from C > > LC limit 30 (90/3) and denisty = 10/30*100 = 33 > > Y copy corve from LC > > LM copy corve from LC > > > > why you choose : > > GRAY_HIGHLIGHT=4 > > GRAY_SHADOW=8 > > GRAY_OVERLAP=16 > > GRAY_GAMMA=1 > > am i supposed to make some other considerations ? > > a good starting point wasn't > > GRAY_HIGHLIGHT=10 > > GRAY_SHADOW=10 > > GRAY_OVERLAP= > > GRAY_GAMMA=1 > > > > Here my new .qidf i named the curve with your name :-) > > > > PRINTER=QuadR260-MIS > > CURVE_NAME=MK-EAM-HOWARD_1 > > GRAPH_CURVE=YES > > N_OF_INKS=6 > > DEFAULT_INK_LIMIT=30 > > BOOST_K=35 > > LIMIT_K=30 > > LIMIT_C=45 > > LIMIT_M=45 > > LIMIT_Y=30 > > LIMIT_LC=30 > > LIMIT_LM=30 > > N_OF_GRAY_PARTS=3 > > GRAY_INK_1=K > > GRAY_VAL_1=100 > > GRAY_INK_2=C > > GRAY_VAL_2=50 > > GRAY_INK_3=LC > > GRAY_VAL_3=33 > > GRAY_HIGHLIGHT=4 > > GRAY_SHADOW=8 > > GRAY_OVERLAP=16 > > GRAY_GAMMA=1 > > GRAY_CURVE= > > N_OF_TONER_PARTS=0 > > TONER_HIGHLIGHT=10 > > TONER_SHADOW=10 > > TONER_GAMMA=1 > > TONER_CURVE= > > N_OF_TONER_2_PARTS=0 > > TONER_2_HIGHLIGHT=10 > > TONER_2_SHADOW=10 > > TONER_2_GAMMA=1 > > TONER_2_CURVE= > > N_OF_UNUSED=0 > > COPY_CURVE_M=C > > COPY_CURVE_Y=LC > > COPY_CURVE_LM=LC > > > > a last question : have i to print with 1440 dpi on EAM ? > > > > many many thanks > > Paolo > > >
Message
Re: a step in my curve
2008-04-17 by paolovertullo
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.