Thanks again for advice. A few more questions if I may. (i) I'm hoping to produce a 1440 curve for EpEnhMatte, since the 2880 curve seems to use too much ink for this paper. Is there any point in trying to base a 1440 curve on an attempt to simulate a Cone-produced 2880 curve, either by using ACV files, or by entering points? That is, will such 2880 curves inherently make the ink limits too low for 1440? Would I be better simply to try and create a 2880 curve and lower the limits, based on the ink separation page? Perhaps another way of asking this question is whether the individual curves that you enter for each ink are absolute or relative curves? Hope this makes sense. (i) Are there any software or Excel tricks for taking two columns of data and producing the "xx.xxx;yy.yyy" pair that are required for entering points in QTR? And conversely, i.e. for taking the pairs and producing columns in a spreadsheet? Ferdinand
Message
Re: Comparing Cone's K7 curves with those produced by QTR curve creation tool.
2008-05-07 by ferdinand_paris
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.