Yahoo Groups archive

QTR-Quadtone RIP

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 23:12 UTC

Message

Re: [QuadtoneRIP] Re: Comparing Cone's K7 curves with those produced by QTR curve creation tool.

2008-05-07 by Howard Shaw

ferdinand_paris wrote:
> Thanks again for advice.  A few more questions if I may.
> 
> (i)  I'm hoping to produce a 1440 curve for EpEnhMatte, since the 2880
> curve seems to use too much ink for this paper.  Is there any point in
> trying to base a 1440 curve on an attempt to simulate a Cone-produced
> 2880 curve, either by using ACV files, or by entering points?  That
> is, will such 2880 curves inherently make the ink limits too low for
> 1440?  Would I be better simply to try and create a 2880 curve and
> lower the limits, based on the ink separation page?  
> 
> Perhaps another way of asking this question is whether the individual
> curves that you enter for each ink are absolute or relative curves? 
> Hope this makes sense.

You just need to use lower ink limits with 2880dpi, probably in the 
region of 35-60% lower.

I'm still not clear why you have rejected the "take existing curve for 
similar paper/adjust ink limit at print time (if necessary)/make ICC for 
new paper" method that Roy suggested. It sounds a lot simpler.

> (i)  Are there any software or Excel tricks for taking two columns of
> data and producing the "xx.xxx;yy.yyy" pair that are required for
> entering points in QTR?  And conversely, i.e. for taking the pairs and
> producing columns in a spreadsheet?
> 

I just copied & pasted straight from Carl's email and all the points 
appeared correctly. The only problems was that their appear to be more 
points than boxes available so I guess you'll have to stick to editing 
the text file if you want that number of points.

Howard

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.