Jon, How do you go about this process? Make your own 26 step ramp? Thanks Joel On Dec 16, 2008, at 11:55 PM, Jon Cone wrote: > The instrument that I know works really well is the Eye1 but its > expensive. I found two people willing to try their Spyders with my > remote profiler. So let me see how that works because its less > expensive. I will post here in a few days. Of course if you could use > ColorMunki - that would be magic because of price... But there is no > driver to allow you to make custom targets. > > A scanner? I am not a big believer in using a scanner in place of a > spectro. I don't know if I want to head you down that road. > > regards, > > Jon > > --- In QuadtoneRIP@yahoogroups.com, "djon43" <djon43@...> wrote: > > > > Jon, I'm about to go ahead (finally) with CIS/Piezo and my 2200... > > > > Is there an versatile color+B&W agnostic device that you'd recommend > > (to take advantage of your "experiment")? > > > > Is that old flatbed scanner technique pretty good or is it a halfway > > measure (I have an epson 3200)? > > > > John Kelly > > > > > > --- In QuadtoneRIP@yahoogroups.com, "Jon Cone" <jon@> wrote: > > > > > > I just completed a custom profiling experiment for the > Piezography K7 > > > and K6 inks. > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Message
Re: [QuadtoneRIP] Re: Custom remote QTR profiling for Piezography K6 and K7 inks
2008-12-17 by Joel Conison
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.