> > >Not sure if it's a benefit or not. A counter-argument is that you would have >less diversity of dropsizes. I think that diversity of dropsizes is particularly >beneficial to eliminating banding. Actually its most important to use drops >that are big enough to merge between lines when the density gets darker. > >Roy > > With some printers that have few nozzles per head it may be worth it. For example the C86 and similar ones. For BO printing or a semi BO with one lighter ink. Or if you want the smallest droplet of (older) printers on purpose. I agree that droplet size diversity should be kept as much as possible. Which brings up the subject again of higher patch numbers in linearising to control the more complex hardware of multiple heads, inks and 2-3 droplet sizes. Ernst
Message
Re: [QuadtoneRIP] Re: QTR 51-step linearisation2
2005-08-23 by Ernst Dinkla
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.