I would like to add/inquire about another factor in the smoothness/banding issue. In a technical article from Epson, the company claims : " Halftone printing In order to simulate varying size halftone dots in computer printers, dithering is used, which creates clusters of dots in a "halftone cell." We recommend using Error Diffusion when printing halftoning. The more dots printed in the cell, the darker the gray. As the screen frequency gets higher (more lines per inch), there is less room for dots in the cell, reducing the number of gray levels that can be generated. Epson's (LPI) lines per inch conversions are as follows: 720 dpi equates to 240 lpi 360 dpi equates to 120 lpi " Question 1 : Am I correct assuming the cell is thus 3x3 e.g. 9+1 shades of grey available per cell. I now refer to an article by Rags Garner (http://www.rags-int- inc.com/PhotoTechStuff/Epson2200/). The purpose of this article is to find out what should be the image resolution vs printer dpi settings to output the best possible pattern. I did not bother in the past and simply set image res at 360 and printer dpi at 1440 for lack of information and common acceptance. Rags findings are that the best image res/dpi settings would be 288ppi/1440dpi based on a 2200 with 4x24 (96) nozzles e.g. 5x5 cell (???). Besides and image of 288ppi would turn to be 144lpi and would be slightly below average human "resolution" thus leading to some detail loss or pixelisation. Question 2: This is the first time I ever come to this settings ? What do you think ? It seems to contradict Epson 3x3 cell. This would assume a 5x5 cell yieling 25+1 possible tones, I would tend to multiple this (less 1 for pure white, not drop) by the 3 variable drop sizes to make 75+1 shades available per cell. It's seems that human eye can perceive about 100 grey tones which would turn the number of ink dilution of 3 more than enough. Question 3 : I'm wondering about the K7, but if the above is not too ridiculous, K7 would not be so usefull (with only gray inks) and linearisation on a 21stepwedeg sould suffice to prevent banding and provide adequate smoothness? I'm a very beginner, I was just initially looking for the proper ppi/dpi settings to print correctly and was wondering about the best linearisation process. Last, while Epson and QTR do not document the screening methods (I hope this is the proper term in English, in French it's "tramage") whether it is AM or FM (or a mix of both should also have an impact propably in the hilglight rendering. Variable dot size call for AM method (dot at same distance, different size)so precise setting ppi/dpi would be of even higher importance (I feel). I'm pretty sure I confuse a lot of things : your advise in the settings and the best quadtone combination would be welcome.
Message
Re: QTR 51-step linearisation2
2005-08-23 by Olivier
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.