QTR-Quadtone RIP

Thanks..do they give you replacements if you find these?  This stuff is not
cheap.

 

From: QuadtoneRIP@yahoogroups.com [mailto:QuadtoneRIP@yahoogroups.com] On
Behalf Of Tyler Boley
Sent: Tuesday, April 28, 2009 1:17 PM
To: QuadtoneRIP@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [QuadtoneRIP] Re: HPR Pearl andBaryta

 






I should warn, I've run into a fair amount of buggers in this paper, I
suspect they haven't got their manufacturing quite together yet...
Tyler

--- In QuadtoneRIP@yahoogroups.com <mailto:QuadtoneRIP%40yahoogroups.com> ,
"George Pappas" <george@...> wrote:
>
> Thanks Tyler,
> 
> 
> 
> It sounds like an excellent refinement and will definitely give it a try.
I
> have not liked how the surface of Fine Art Baryta intrudes into images..
> 
> 
> 
> George
> 
> 
> 
> From: QuadtoneRIP@yahoogroups.com <mailto:QuadtoneRIP%40yahoogroups.com>
[mailto:QuadtoneRIP@yahoogroups.com <mailto:QuadtoneRIP%40yahoogroups.com> ]
On
> Behalf Of Tyler Boley
> Sent: Tuesday, April 28, 2009 11:22 AM
> To: QuadtoneRIP@yahoogroups.com <mailto:QuadtoneRIP%40yahoogroups.com> 
> Subject: [QuadtoneRIP] Re: HPR Pearl andBaryta
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> George, as long as you are still deciding, you might want to take a lok at
> the Photo Rag Baryta, I like it much more than the other two. The surface
> does not have the odd naugahyde texture of the fine are baryta, it's finer
> like the pearl, but it takes ink better than the pearl and has less
> bronzing.
> The rag content handles very nice too, much softer. It almost seems the
> other two were less successful attempts on the way to the PhotoRag Baryta.
> Regarding hue, it's nearly neutral.
> Tyler
> http://www.custom-digital.com/
> 
> --- In QuadtoneRIP@yahoogroups.com <mailto:QuadtoneRIP%40yahoogroups.com>
<mailto:QuadtoneRIP%40yahoogroups.com> ,
> "George Pappas" <george@> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Alfredo,
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > I have not used Photo Rag Baryta.





[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]