Tyler, have you had any issues with flaking with Photo Rag Baryta? Terry. On 28/04/09 11:16 AM, "Tyler Boley" <tyler@...> wrote: > I should warn, I've run into a fair amount of buggers in this paper, I suspect > they haven't got their manufacturing quite together yet... > Tyler > > --- In QuadtoneRIP@yahoogroups.com, "George Pappas" <george@...> wrote: >> >> Thanks Tyler, >> >> >> >> It sounds like an excellent refinement and will definitely give it a try. I >> have not liked how the surface of Fine Art Baryta intrudes into images.. >> >> >> >> George >> >> >> >> From: QuadtoneRIP@yahoogroups.com [mailto:QuadtoneRIP@yahoogroups.com] On >> Behalf Of Tyler Boley >> Sent: Tuesday, April 28, 2009 11:22 AM >> To: QuadtoneRIP@yahoogroups.com >> Subject: [QuadtoneRIP] Re: HPR Pearl andBaryta >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> George, as long as you are still deciding, you might want to take a lok at >> the Photo Rag Baryta, I like it much more than the other two. The surface >> does not have the odd naugahyde texture of the fine are baryta, it's finer >> like the pearl, but it takes ink better than the pearl and has less >> bronzing. >> The rag content handles very nice too, much softer. It almost seems the >> other two were less successful attempts on the way to the PhotoRag Baryta. >> Regarding hue, it's nearly neutral. >> Tyler >> http://www.custom-digital.com/ >> >> --- In QuadtoneRIP@yahoogroups.com <mailto:QuadtoneRIP%40yahoogroups.com> , >> "George Pappas" <george@> wrote: >>> >>> Hi Alfredo, >>> >>> >>> >>> I have not used Photo Rag Baryta. > > > > ------------------------------------ > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > >
Message
Re: [QuadtoneRIP] Re: HPR Pearl andBaryta
2009-04-29 by Terry Ritz