That seems to have done it; though I would really love to understand why. As I understood the various work arounds for the missing "no color management" option, I thought that simply having consistency between the assigned profile and the "printed" profile was sufficient to trick the drivers into not doing any color mapping. I wonder if its really the different rendering intent that is making this work right... I may do some experimentation later. You are correct, though, I could probably been happy just taking an existing profile and doing a new linearization curve for it. This, however, was less about getting a good print and more about teaching myself the process of building a profile. thanks! --- In QuadtoneRIP@yahoogroups.com, Roy Harrington <roy@...> wrote: > > The symptoms sure point to an unwanted color conversion happening somewhere. > It sounds like you are doing the right thing but the OS X color > management has been > particularly hard to pin down version to version. I need to go > through more testing. > > The one thing I can think that may be worth trying is to use sRGB > rather than ProPhoto. > (Its the internal default for lots in OSX).I'd also use Perceptual > Intent and BPC checked on. > Another variable (which shouldn't matter) is in Color Settings try > sRGB as the RGB working space. > > As a general comment: I'd read Amadou Diallo's workflow on the > Download page. You > can probably do just fine re-linearizing an existing profile. The > profiles for photo papers > especially are extremely similar. > > Roy >
Message
Re: Problems printing ink separation page for 3880
2010-12-29 by scholt64@bellsouth.net
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.