Yahoo Groups archive

QTR-Quadtone RIP

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 23:12 UTC

Thread

resizing

resizing

2013-12-12 by <jacques.caron@...>

Hi all

Using QTRip for printing, I don't really check my sizes in Photoshop before saving the file in tiff format. When I print, if the picture is too big for the paper size, I reduce it by using the handles in QTRip.
My question, is it better to have a perfect size in Photoshop or the QTRip algorithm is OK?

Thanks

Re: [QuadtoneRIP] resizing

2013-12-12 by Bernard Wolf

I think you have to tick the box in QTR to size it to fit the paper size you are using.. not in front of my QTR right now, but I think that is it. I never resize.



On Thursday, December 12, 2013 3:33:26 PM, "jacques.caron@videotron.qc.ca" <jacques.caron@...> wrote:
 
  
Hi all


Using QTRip for printing, I don't really check my sizes in Photoshop before saving the file in tiff format. When I print, if the picture is too big for the paper size, I reduce it by using the handles in QTRip.
My question, is it better to have a perfect size in Photoshop or the QTRip algorithm is OK?

Thanks

Re: [QuadtoneRIP] resizing

2013-12-12 by <hflockwood@...>

I'm not sure I understand the question, or the answer by Mr. Wolf.


I believe the question is really about resampling and the algorithm controlling it. My attitude in printing is, if possible, do not resample; print all, and only those pixels in the original image. This means choose one of the canonical Epson resolutions (1440, 720, 360, 288, 240,…) that will result in ppi = dpi. That is, all and only the original pixels will be printed.


For instance, if the long dimension of your image is ~5500 pixel, then choosing a resolution of 360 dpi will result in a print that is 5500/360 = 15.278 in, and if the image has not been cropped, you'll get a print of about 15x10 in.


Do the math; it's straightforward. Of course, you cannot avoid resampling if you constrain both the printing resolution and the print size together.


HFL

Re: [QuadtoneRIP] resizing

2013-12-12 by Jacques Caron

Hi

You understood the question quite right. I'll do the maths and use resizing only if needed and in Photoshop. I never upsize any print. Actually I have more than needed for the size of my prints so I just wanted to know if someone knew the difference between Photoshop, Genuine Fractals and QTR as far as algorithms are concern.

Thanks for your answer

JC
Le 2013-12-12 à 17:34, hflockwood@verizon.net a écrit :



I'm not sure I understand the question, or the answer by Mr. Wolf.


I believe the question is really about resampling and the algorithm controlling it. My attitude in printing is, if possible, do not resample; print all, and only those pixels in the original image. This means choose one of the canonical Epson resolutions (1440, 720, 360, 288, 240,…) that will result in ppi = dpi. That is, all and only the original pixels will be printed.


For instance, if the long dimension of your image is ~5500 pixel, then choosing a resolution of 360 dpi will result in a print that is 5500/360 = 15.278 in, and if the image has not been cropped, you'll get a print of about 15x10 in.


Do the math; it's straightforward. Of course, you cannot avoid resampling if you constrain both the printing resolution and the print size together.


HFL




Jacques Caron

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.