The end of QTR?
2019-10-02 by chanhongwang@...
Yahoo Groups archive
Index last updated: 2026-04-28 23:12 UTC
Thread
2019-10-02 by chanhongwang@...
Epson just annouced their new 24" and 44" printer which I'm pretty sure they shared the printhead with P10000 and P20000. I am wondering if QTR will be update and able to communicate with these 2 new model or not since they are very different from the old printhead technology. We'll see...
2019-10-02 by roy@...
2019-10-02 by Paul Roark
Well looking at the specs I don't think there's any way to support the new Pro printers.
Apple is due to make things harder too. Save your old printers and computers. Sorry.Roy
2019-10-02 by richard@...
Roy, is the problem the signing and app notarization or the separating the OS into the read-only system stuff and user data partitions? I got worried watching wwdc and the driver kit stuff, but didn’t expect problems at the printer level.
2019-10-02 by roy@...
2019-10-02 by roy@...
2019-10-07 by Walker Blackwell
Drivers will be able to be used forever you just need to sign the BOM/hash that lives in >Library/Printers/ so you need an apple developer’s key. It’s easy though. $70/yr. Best, -Walker
> On Oct 2, 2019, at 4:55 PM, roy@... [QuadtoneRIP] <QuadtoneRIP@yahoogroups.com> wrote: > > I've played with signing and notarizing. Had mixed results but fortunately its still ok > > to have neither and still get programs installed. Who knows when that will stop > working. I think I've figured the separation of system/data thing and its not a big > problem. But there's talk and rumors of NO printer drivers sometime in the future. > I really don't know what that means. Maybe printers will need to take PDFs directly. > That would preclude QTR driver doing something differently. So far I really don't know. > Basically to secure everything on an OS you have to disallow system level third party code. > > Even now there's a new protocol for Pro printers but it happens that they still > accept old protocol. Epson could drop that any time. There's no documentation > on the new protocol. > > Roy > > >