Roy,
Thanks for the quick response.
If one has a reasonably good flat bed scanner, is there any
significant advantage to using a spectrophotometer (ie, spending the
money to get one) over Paul Roark's flatbed scanner method?
By the way, this weekend I finally had a chance to experiment with
QTR. I downloaded the Migrant Mother and Mississippi General Store
circa 1936 images from the Library of Congress and printed them on
EEM using the 1280 and UT2 inkset. I used a 50/50 mix of neutral
and carbon settings. The results are absolutely amazing! It's the
best $50.00 I've spent on software in a long time.
Bob Marsolais
--- In QuadtoneRIP@yahoogroups.com, Roy Harrington <roy@...> wrote:
>
> The Display version is not sufficient. All the other Eye-One
packages
> are OK
> and in fact are the same -- its just the software that is
different
> which you
> won't use for QTR anyway.
>
> I don't know the Sequel product. You just need to be able to read
> patches
> on paper and get either density or Lab readings. The Eye-One is
> probably
> the best integrated though.
>
> Roy
>
>
> On Monday, March 20, 2006, at 06:32 PM, Bob Marsolais wrote:
>
> > It looks like GretagMacBeth has at least three different
> > colorimeters/spectrophotometers. They have an "Eye-One
colorimeter"
> > that comes with the "Display 2" package (about $250) and
> > the "accelerated Eye-One Pro spectrophotometer" that comes with
> > the "Design" package, about $1000. Then there is the "Eye-One
Pro
> > with UV cutoff filter. The Eye-One Pro (without UV filter)
cannot be
> > upgraded to a Eye-One Pro with UV filter.
> >
> > Which of these three instruments does the ICC profile generator
work
> > with? Can instruments from other manufacturers be used with
QTR's
> > profile software? Specifically, can the Sequel 4CL be used with
QTR?
Show quoted textHide quoted text
> >
> > Thanks!
> >
> -
> Roy Harrington
> roy@...
> Black & White Photo Gallery
> http://www.harrington.com
>